Identification of Beef Odors under Different Storage Day and Processing Temperature Conditions Using an Odor Sensing System

This study used an odor sensing system with a 16-channel electrochemical sensor array to measure beef odors, aiming to distinguish odors under different storage days and processing temperatures for quality monitoring. Six storage days ranged from purchase (D0) to eight days (D8), with three temperature conditions: no heat (RT), boiling (100 °C), and frying (180 °C). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis showed that odorants in the beef varied under different conditions. Compounds like acetoin and 1-hexanol changed significantly with the storage days, while pyrazines and furans were more detectable at higher temperatures. The odor sensing system data were visualized using principal component analysis (PCA) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). PCA and unsupervised UMAP clustered beef odors by storage days but struggled with the processing temperatures. Supervised UMAP accurately clustered different temperatures and dates. Machine learning analysis using six classifiers, including support vector machine, achieved 57% accuracy for PCA-reduced data, while unsupervised UMAP reached 49.1% accuracy. Supervised UMAP significantly enhanced the classification accuracy, achieving over 99.5% with the dimensionality reduced to three or above. Results suggest that the odor sensing system can sufficiently enhance non-destructive beef quality and safety monitoring. This research advances electronic nose applications and explores data downscaling techniques, providing valuable insights for future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175590
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Beef Odors under Different Storage Day and Processing Temperature Conditions Using an Odor Sensing System

Peng Nan, Jinlong Kang, Rui Yatabe, Takeshi Onodera et al.
4 citations
Sensors
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.74
article

Identification of Beef Odors under Different Storage Day and Processing Temperature Conditions Using an Odor Sensing System

Peng Nan, Jinlong Kang, Rui Yatabe, Takeshi Onodera, Yuanchang Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study used an odor sensing system with a 16-channel electrochemical sensor array to measure beef odors, aiming to distinguish odors under different storage days and processing temperatures for quality monitoring. Six storage days ranged from purchase (D0) to eight days (D8), with three temperature conditions: no heat (RT), boiling (100 °C), and frying (180 °C). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis showed that odorants in the beef varied under different conditions. Compounds like acetoin and 1-hexanol changed significantly with the storage days, while pyrazines and furans were more detectable at higher temperatures. The odor sensing system data were visualized using principal component analysis (PCA) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). PCA and unsupervised UMAP clustered beef odors by storage days but struggled with the processing temperatures. Supervised UMAP accurately clustered different temperatures and dates. Machine learning analysis using six classifiers, including support vector machine, achieved 57% accuracy for PCA-reduced data, while unsupervised UMAP reached 49.1% accuracy. Supervised UMAP significantly enhanced the classification accuracy, achieving over 99.5% with the dimensionality reduced to three or above. Results suggest that the odor sensing system can sufficiently enhance non-destructive beef quality and safety monitoring. This research advances electronic nose applications and explores data downscaling techniques, providing valuable insights for future studies.

SensorsVol. 24(17)
Kyushu University (JP)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.