Exploring the Effects of Machine Learning Algorithms of Varying Transparency on Performance Outcomes

Machine learning algorithms are becoming increasingly used in a variety of settings but are often black box in nature. Recent work has emphasized the need for algorithms to be more interpretable to end users, and calibrated classification models (CCMs) are one such type of model. CCMs provide more accurate confidence intervals to the end user, however little research has investigated how CCM confidence estimates and actual classification accuracy impact user performance. Therefore, the current study explored how expectations for machine learning algorithms and their actual behaviors influenced task performance and decision time. Results demonstrated that algorithms with high confidence and low classification accuracy led to the lowest performance and highest decision time in an image classification task. Limitations of the current study are discussed along with future research opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260350
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Effects of Machine Learning Algorithms of Varying Transparency on Performance Outcomes

Sasha M. Willis, Krista N. Harris, Walter Bennette, August Capiola et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.35
article

Exploring the Effects of Machine Learning Algorithms of Varying Transparency on Performance Outcomes

Sasha M. Willis, Krista N. Harris, Walter Bennette, August Capiola, Sarah A. Jessup, Gene M. Alarcon, Dexter Johnson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms are becoming increasingly used in a variety of settings but are often black box in nature. Recent work has emphasized the need for algorithms to be more interpretable to end users, and calibrated classification models (CCMs) are one such type of model. CCMs provide more accurate confidence intervals to the end user, however little research has investigated how CCM confidence estimates and actual classification accuracy impact user performance. Therefore, the current study explored how expectations for machine learning algorithms and their actual behaviors influenced task performance and decision time. Results demonstrated that algorithms with high confidence and low classification accuracy led to the lowest performance and highest decision time in an image classification task. Limitations of the current study are discussed along with future research opportunities.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), Wright State University (US), Consortium of Universities of the Washington Metropolitan Area (US), DCS Corporation (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.