Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations

Abstract In recent years, there has been an alarming increase in both proposed and enacted legislation that targets diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within higher education and organizations. These laws aim to dismantle protections and support for vulnerable individuals and groups. In this focal article, we provide an overview of the motives driving these anti-DEI legislative initiatives and categorize the laws based on the type of restrictions they impose: (a) reduction in knowledge, (b) reduction in access, and (c) reduction in support. Next, we discuss the consequences these anti-DEI laws yield for individuals, organizations, and society at large and provide an overview of how individuals and organizations may counteract these regressive policies. Last, we conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to investigate and call attention to the consequences of anti-DEI laws for recruitment and selection, well-being and safety of minoritized individuals, organizational reputation, and organizational performance and profits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.12
Citations
27
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations

Kristen P. Jones, Isaac E. Sabat, Eden B. King, Kayla B. Follmer
27 citations
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Gender Diversity and Inequality
25.10
article

Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations

Kristen P. Jones, Isaac E. Sabat, Eden B. King, Kayla B. Follmer
article en
27 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, there has been an alarming increase in both proposed and enacted legislation that targets diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within higher education and organizations. These laws aim to dismantle protections and support for vulnerable individuals and groups. In this focal article, we provide an overview of the motives driving these anti-DEI legislative initiatives and categorize the laws based on the type of restrictions they impose: (a) reduction in knowledge, (b) reduction in access, and (c) reduction in support. Next, we discuss the consequences these anti-DEI laws yield for individuals, organizations, and society at large and provide an overview of how individuals and organizations may counteract these regressive policies. Last, we conclude with a call to action for I-O psychologists to investigate and call attention to the consequences of anti-DEI laws for recruitment and selection, well-being and safety of minoritized individuals, organizational reputation, and organizational performance and profits.

Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol. 17(4)
West Virginia University (US), University of Houston (US), Rice University (US), University of Memphis (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
25.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.