New Exploration of Single-Incision Plus Two Ports Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Based on the Principle of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) being a standard procedure, its main shortcomings include narrow operating space and instrument collisions. Although the proposal of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) reduces the operational difficulty, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) involves complex digestive tract resection and anastomosis. To reduce the number of incisions while ensuring the quality of LPD, we propose a single-incision plus two ports LPD (SILPD + 2) procedure wherein a surgeon uses two trocars with a traditional layout while the assistant and scope assistant conduct subumbilical incision. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective analysis was performed of the perioperative data of 64 patients who underwent total LPD at our department from January to June 2023, including their age, gender, surgical operation time, estimated bleeding loss, and postoperative complications. Based on the number of inserted trocars, the patients were assigned to the conventional LPD (CLPD) group (<i>n</i> = 55) with five incisions and the new SILPD + 2 group (<i>n</i> = 9). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 64 patients were included in this study, including 55 in the CLPD group and 9 in the SILPD + 2 group. The SILPD + 2 group patients had lower age and body mass index when compared to the CLPD group patients, albeit there was no statistical significance. In both groups of patients, laparoscopic surgery was completed. Regarding the operation time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative blood transfusion, the SILPD + 2 group showed no significant disadvantage. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> When compared to CLPD, SILPD + 2 reduced the surgical difficulty by reducing incisions, and there was no significant difference in the short-term prognosis outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0412
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Exploration of Single-Incision Plus Two Ports Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Based on the Principle of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery

Jianhua Liu, Xueqing Liu, Zixuan Hu, Zhongqiang Xing
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

New Exploration of Single-Incision Plus Two Ports Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Based on the Principle of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery

Jianhua Liu, Xueqing Liu, Zixuan Hu, Zhongqiang Xing
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Despite single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) being a standard procedure, its main shortcomings include narrow operating space and instrument collisions. Although the proposal of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) reduces the operational difficulty, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) involves complex digestive tract resection and anastomosis. To reduce the number of incisions while ensuring the quality of LPD, we propose a single-incision plus two ports LPD (SILPD + 2) procedure wherein a surgeon uses two trocars with a traditional layout while the assistant and scope assistant conduct subumbilical incision. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective analysis was performed of the perioperative data of 64 patients who underwent total LPD at our department from January to June 2023, including their age, gender, surgical operation time, estimated bleeding loss, and postoperative complications. Based on the number of inserted trocars, the patients were assigned to the conventional LPD (CLPD) group (<i>n</i> = 55) with five incisions and the new SILPD + 2 group (<i>n</i> = 9). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 64 patients were included in this study, including 55 in the CLPD group and 9 in the SILPD + 2 group. The SILPD + 2 group patients had lower age and body mass index when compared to the CLPD group patients, albeit there was no statistical significance. In both groups of patients, laparoscopic surgery was completed. Regarding the operation time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative blood transfusion, the SILPD + 2 group showed no significant disadvantage. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> When compared to CLPD, SILPD + 2 reduced the surgical difficulty by reducing incisions, and there was no significant difference in the short-term prognosis outcomes.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 34(10)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.