National fiscal rules, Maastricht fiscal criteria and non-linear public debt dynamics in Serbia

The aim of the paper is to assess the reaction of fiscal policymakers in Serbia when the public debt-to-GDP ratio is above the 45% limit set in the national fiscal rules. The paper proposes a two-regime nonlinear self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model as an appropriate econometric framework for modeling the asymmetries in the dynamics of the public debt/GDP ratio with respect to the 45% public debt limit. The empirical evidence suggests that fiscal policymakers in Serbia do not adhere to the 45% public debt/GDP ceiling and instead use the Maastricht limit of 60% as a target reference point for public debt management. The article contributes to the current policy debate by providing empirical evidence to support the claim that the behavior of fiscal policymakers in Serbia between 2001Q1 and 2023Q2 could jeopardize the credibility of fiscal policy and increase the probability of default by the Serbian government on its maturing public debt.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Analysis
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.24.57.3.pp38-51
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National fiscal rules, Maastricht fiscal criteria and non-linear public debt dynamics in Serbia

Vladimir Andrić
1 citations
Economic Analysis
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
1.13
article

National fiscal rules, Maastricht fiscal criteria and non-linear public debt dynamics in Serbia

Vladimir Andrić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to assess the reaction of fiscal policymakers in Serbia when the public debt-to-GDP ratio is above the 45% limit set in the national fiscal rules. The paper proposes a two-regime nonlinear self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) model as an appropriate econometric framework for modeling the asymmetries in the dynamics of the public debt/GDP ratio with respect to the 45% public debt limit. The empirical evidence suggests that fiscal policymakers in Serbia do not adhere to the 45% public debt/GDP ceiling and instead use the Maastricht limit of 60% as a target reference point for public debt management. The article contributes to the current policy debate by providing empirical evidence to support the claim that the behavior of fiscal policymakers in Serbia between 2001Q1 and 2023Q2 could jeopardize the credibility of fiscal policy and increase the probability of default by the Serbian government on its maturing public debt.

Economic Analysis
Institute of Economic Sciences (RS)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.