Study on the Influencing Factors of Forest Tree-Species Classification Based on Landsat and Sentinel-2 Imagery

Accurate forest tree-species classification not only provides data support for forest resource management but also serves as a crucial parameter for simulating various ecological processes. However, the results of forest tree-species classification have been affected by multiple factors, such as the spectral resolution, spatial resolution, and radiometric resolution of imagery, the classification algorithms used, the sample size, and the timing of image acquisition phases. Although there are many studies on the impact of individual factors on tree-species classification, there is a lack of systematic studies quantifying the magnitude of these factors’ influences, leading to uncertainties about the relative importance of different factors. In this study, Landsat-8, Landsat-9, and Sentinel-2 imagery was used as the foundational data, and random forest (RF), gradient tree boosting (GTB), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were employed to classify forest tree species. High-accuracy regional forest tree-species classification was achieved by exploring the impacts of spectral resolution, spatial resolution, radiometric resolution, classification algorithms, sample size, and image time phases. The results show that, for the commonly used Landsat-8, Landsat-9, and Sentinel-2 imagery, the tree-species classification results from Landsat-9 are the best, with an overall accuracy of 74.21% and a kappa of 0.71. Among the various influencing factors, the classification algorithm, image time phases, and sample size have relatively larger impacts on tree-species classification results, each exceeding 10%, while the positive impact of radiometric resolution is the smallest, at only 3.15%. Conversely, spectral and spatial resolutions had negative effects on tree-species classification results, at −4.09% and −1.4%, respectively. Based on the 30-m spring Landsat-9 and Sentinel-2 imagery, with 300 samples for each tree-species category, the classification results using the RF algorithm were the best, with an overall accuracy of 87.07% and a kappa coefficient of 0.85. The results indicate that different factors have different impacts on forest tree-species classification results, with classification algorithms, image time phases, and sample size having the largest impacts. Higher spatial and spectral resolutions do not improve the classification accuracy. Therefore, future studies should focus on selecting appropriate classification algorithms, sample sizes, and images from seasons with greater tree differences to improve tree-species classification results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091511
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Influencing Factors of Forest Tree-Species Classification Based on Landsat and Sentinel-2 Imagery

Xu Tang, Xin Lai, Yuecan Li, Haotian You et al.
5 citations
Forests
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
2.29
article

Study on the Influencing Factors of Forest Tree-Species Classification Based on Landsat and Sentinel-2 Imagery

Xu Tang, Xin Lai, Yuecan Li, Haotian You, Jianjun Chen, Zhaotong Ren, Runlian Huang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Accurate forest tree-species classification not only provides data support for forest resource management but also serves as a crucial parameter for simulating various ecological processes. However, the results of forest tree-species classification have been affected by multiple factors, such as the spectral resolution, spatial resolution, and radiometric resolution of imagery, the classification algorithms used, the sample size, and the timing of image acquisition phases. Although there are many studies on the impact of individual factors on tree-species classification, there is a lack of systematic studies quantifying the magnitude of these factors’ influences, leading to uncertainties about the relative importance of different factors. In this study, Landsat-8, Landsat-9, and Sentinel-2 imagery was used as the foundational data, and random forest (RF), gradient tree boosting (GTB), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were employed to classify forest tree species. High-accuracy regional forest tree-species classification was achieved by exploring the impacts of spectral resolution, spatial resolution, radiometric resolution, classification algorithms, sample size, and image time phases. The results show that, for the commonly used Landsat-8, Landsat-9, and Sentinel-2 imagery, the tree-species classification results from Landsat-9 are the best, with an overall accuracy of 74.21% and a kappa of 0.71. Among the various influencing factors, the classification algorithm, image time phases, and sample size have relatively larger impacts on tree-species classification results, each exceeding 10%, while the positive impact of radiometric resolution is the smallest, at only 3.15%. Conversely, spectral and spatial resolutions had negative effects on tree-species classification results, at −4.09% and −1.4%, respectively. Based on the 30-m spring Landsat-9 and Sentinel-2 imagery, with 300 samples for each tree-species category, the classification results using the RF algorithm were the best, with an overall accuracy of 87.07% and a kappa coefficient of 0.85. The results indicate that different factors have different impacts on forest tree-species classification results, with classification algorithms, image time phases, and sample size having the largest impacts. Higher spatial and spectral resolutions do not improve the classification accuracy. Therefore, future studies should focus on selecting appropriate classification algorithms, sample sizes, and images from seasons with greater tree differences to improve tree-species classification results.

ForestsVol. 15(9)
Guilin University of Technology (CN), Jiangxi Province Forestry Survey Planning Institute (CN)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guilin University of Technology, Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.