Fuzzy Stress and Strength Reliability Based on the Generalized Mixture Exponential Distribution

This paper discusses the reliability of stress and strength,R, and fuzzy stress and strength reliability, RF, based on generalized mixtures of exponential distributions. We propose several estimation methods, such as the maximize likelihood estimation, the weighted least-squares estimation, and the percentile estimation, to estimate the corresponding measures. Simulation studies have been conducted to compare the proposed estimators’ performance using different settings. These comparisons are based on biases (Bias) and mean squared errors (MSEs), and we find that MSE(PE)>MSE(MLE)>MSE(WLE) and |Bias(PE)|>|Bias(WLE)|>|Bias(MLE)| in most cases. Moreover, the values of RF have the same pattern as R, and the values of MSEs and biases for RF are smaller than R. As the sample size increases, the values of biases for both reliabilities decrease and approach 0. Ultimately, we apply the proposed methods to a data set to illustrate its significance. We find that the estimated values of R are greater than those of RF for all the estimation methods. Moreover, the fuzzy estimators of RF are approximately equal to the estimators R.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12172684
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuzzy Stress and Strength Reliability Based on the Generalized Mixture Exponential Distribution

Weizhong Tian, Chengliang Tian, Sha Li, Yunchu Zhang et al.
Mathematics
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Fuzzy Stress and Strength Reliability Based on the Generalized Mixture Exponential Distribution

Weizhong Tian, Chengliang Tian, Sha Li, Yunchu Zhang, Jiayi Han
article en

Abstract

This paper discusses the reliability of stress and strength,R, and fuzzy stress and strength reliability, RF, based on generalized mixtures of exponential distributions. We propose several estimation methods, such as the maximize likelihood estimation, the weighted least-squares estimation, and the percentile estimation, to estimate the corresponding measures. Simulation studies have been conducted to compare the proposed estimators’ performance using different settings. These comparisons are based on biases (Bias) and mean squared errors (MSEs), and we find that MSE(PE)>MSE(MLE)>MSE(WLE) and |Bias(PE)|>|Bias(WLE)|>|Bias(MLE)| in most cases. Moreover, the values of RF have the same pattern as R, and the values of MSEs and biases for RF are smaller than R. As the sample size increases, the values of biases for both reliabilities decrease and approach 0. Ultimately, we apply the proposed methods to a data set to illustrate its significance. We find that the estimated values of R are greater than those of RF for all the estimation methods. Moreover, the fuzzy estimators of RF are approximately equal to the estimators R.

MathematicsVol. 12(17)
Qingdao University (CN), Shenzhen Technology University (CN)
Shenzhen Technology University
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.