A Critical Encounter: Jean Floud’s Appraisal of Karl Mannheim

This paper examines Jean Floud's assessment of the work of Karl Mannheim, against the background of the development of British sociology of education in the 1940s and 50s. She compared his approach with that of Durkheim, concluding that both adopted a focus on social statics rather than dynamics, this reflecting their conservative political orientations. Some aspects of Floud's critique are questionable, but other points she makes are telling. The issues in dispute here are ones that continue to be of importance in the sociology of education, and in social science more generally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Educational Studies
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2024.2390014
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Encounter: Jean Floud’s Appraisal of Karl Mannheim

Martyn Hammersley
2 citations
British Journal of Educational Studies
Philosophy, Science, and History
12.08
article

A Critical Encounter: Jean Floud’s Appraisal of Karl Mannheim

Martyn Hammersley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines Jean Floud's assessment of the work of Karl Mannheim, against the background of the development of British sociology of education in the 1940s and 50s. She compared his approach with that of Durkheim, concluding that both adopted a focus on social statics rather than dynamics, this reflecting their conservative political orientations. Some aspects of Floud's critique are questionable, but other points she makes are telling. The issues in dispute here are ones that continue to be of importance in the sociology of education, and in social science more generally.

British Journal of Educational StudiesVol. 73(2)
The Open University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy, Science, and History
12.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.