<scp>MB09</scp>, a denosumab biosimilar candidate: Biosimilarity demonstration in a phase I study in healthy subjects

This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blinded, three-arm, single-dose, parallel study aimed to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between MB09 (a denosumab biosimilar candidate) and reference denosumab (XGEVA® from European Union [EU-reference] and United States [US-reference]) in a healthy male population. The primary PK endpoints included: Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration timepoint (AUC<sub>0-last</sub>); and maximum observed serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Secondary endpoints included: AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>), time to reach maximum observed concentration, clearance, terminal phase half-life, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. A total of 255 subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a subcutaneous 35 mg dose of MB09 or reference denosumab. C<sub>max</sub> was reached after denosumab administration, followed by a decline in the concentration with similar terminal phase half-live across treatment arms. Systemic exposure of MB09 (AUC<sub>0-last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>) was equivalent to the reference denosumab, as the 90% confidence intervals around the geometric least square mean ratios laid within the predefined acceptance limits (80.00%, 125.00%) across all comparisons. Pharmacodynamic parameters, based on the percent of change from baseline in serum C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 collagen levels, were similar across the three arms. The treatments were considered safe and generally well tolerated, with 92 treatment-emergent adverse events reported (most Grade 2 and 3) and similarly distributed. Immunogenicity was low and similarly distributed. These results provide strong evidence that supports the biosimilarity between MB09 and denosumab reference products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70013
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MB09, a denosumab biosimilar candidate: Biosimilarity demonstration in a phase I study in healthy subjects

Elisabete Carapuça, Monika Tomaszewska‐Kiecana, Javier Queiruga‐Parada, Amalia Florez‐Igual
3 citations
Clinical and Translational Science
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.72
article

MB09, a denosumab biosimilar candidate: Biosimilarity demonstration in a phase I study in healthy subjects

Elisabete Carapuça, Monika Tomaszewska‐Kiecana, Javier Queiruga‐Parada, Amalia Florez‐Igual
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blinded, three-arm, single-dose, parallel study aimed to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between MB09 (a denosumab biosimilar candidate) and reference denosumab (XGEVA® from European Union [EU-reference] and United States [US-reference]) in a healthy male population. The primary PK endpoints included: Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration timepoint (AUC<sub>0-last</sub>); and maximum observed serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Secondary endpoints included: AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>), time to reach maximum observed concentration, clearance, terminal phase half-life, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. A total of 255 subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a subcutaneous 35 mg dose of MB09 or reference denosumab. C<sub>max</sub> was reached after denosumab administration, followed by a decline in the concentration with similar terminal phase half-live across treatment arms. Systemic exposure of MB09 (AUC<sub>0-last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>) was equivalent to the reference denosumab, as the 90% confidence intervals around the geometric least square mean ratios laid within the predefined acceptance limits (80.00%, 125.00%) across all comparisons. Pharmacodynamic parameters, based on the percent of change from baseline in serum C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 collagen levels, were similar across the three arms. The treatments were considered safe and generally well tolerated, with 92 treatment-emergent adverse events reported (most Grade 2 and 3) and similarly distributed. Immunogenicity was low and similarly distributed. These results provide strong evidence that supports the biosimilarity between MB09 and denosumab reference products.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 17(9)
Ixion (Spain) (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<scp>MB09</scp>, a denosumab biosimilar candidate: Biosimilarity demonstration in a phase I study in healthy subjects — Elisabete Carapuça, Monika Tomaszewska‐Kiecana, et al. · Clinical and Translational Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS