Shifting the focus: examining knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems

Knowledge brokers are instrumental in improving education, including increasing equitable opportunities for all students. While many researchers have investigated the social networks between knowledge brokers and their audiences, less is known about knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems, defined as partner networks with organizations and individuals for collaboration, support, and resource exchange. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems (e.g., size, strength of relationships, network closure) and how relational ecosystems support and shape knowledge creation and mobilization. This study uses egocentric social network analysis methods to analyze survey and interview data from six equity-focused and evidence-based knowledge broker organizations that create and mobilize resources to different levels of the education system, from K-12 schools to state-level policy contexts in the United States. The evidence suggests that participating knowledge brokers partnered with numerous and heterogeneous individuals and organization types, including researchers, leaders, foundations, and intermediaries. The core relational ecosystems were characterized by strong relationships, partly driven by individual team members' social networks and comprising micro-networks, and were well-connected (i.e., network closure). Furthermore, our data indicates that beyond being collaborators, partners provided infrastructure and financial resources, served as intermediaries for knowledge mobilization, provided insights into policy contexts and audiences' needs, supported knowledge brokers' capacity building, and connected knowledge brokers to people and organizations. These relationships were not one-directional, but often mutually beneficial, resulting in reciprocated relational ecosystems. Our findings suggest that it might be beneficial for knowledge brokers to strategically cultivate relational ecosystems by supporting individual team members in cultivating their social networks, adapting to evolving needs and challenges while being conscious of long-term priorities, and balancing strong ties with the (re-)engagement with new partners and different sources of information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1441832
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting the focus: examining knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems

Marie Lockton, Martin Rehm, Alan J. Daly, Anita Caduff et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Education
Social Capital and Networks
2.26
article

Shifting the focus: examining knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems

Marie Lockton, Martin Rehm, Alan J. Daly, Anita Caduff, L. Romina Bornhaupt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Knowledge brokers are instrumental in improving education, including increasing equitable opportunities for all students. While many researchers have investigated the social networks between knowledge brokers and their audiences, less is known about knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems, defined as partner networks with organizations and individuals for collaboration, support, and resource exchange. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of knowledge brokers' relational ecosystems (e.g., size, strength of relationships, network closure) and how relational ecosystems support and shape knowledge creation and mobilization. This study uses egocentric social network analysis methods to analyze survey and interview data from six equity-focused and evidence-based knowledge broker organizations that create and mobilize resources to different levels of the education system, from K-12 schools to state-level policy contexts in the United States. The evidence suggests that participating knowledge brokers partnered with numerous and heterogeneous individuals and organization types, including researchers, leaders, foundations, and intermediaries. The core relational ecosystems were characterized by strong relationships, partly driven by individual team members' social networks and comprising micro-networks, and were well-connected (i.e., network closure). Furthermore, our data indicates that beyond being collaborators, partners provided infrastructure and financial resources, served as intermediaries for knowledge mobilization, provided insights into policy contexts and audiences' needs, supported knowledge brokers' capacity building, and connected knowledge brokers to people and organizations. These relationships were not one-directional, but often mutually beneficial, resulting in reciprocated relational ecosystems. Our findings suggest that it might be beneficial for knowledge brokers to strategically cultivate relational ecosystems by supporting individual team members in cultivating their social networks, adapting to evolving needs and challenges while being conscious of long-term priorities, and balancing strong ties with the (re-)engagement with new partners and different sources of information.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
California Department of Education (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Regensburg (DE)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Social Capital and Networks
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.