Two-Stage Adaptive Enrichment Designs with Survival Outcomes and Adjustment for Misclassification in Predictive Biomarkers

Biomarker enrichment clinical trial designs are versatile tools to assess the treatment effect and increase the efficiency of clinical trials. In this paper, we propose a two-stage enrichment clinical trial design with survival outcomes, and consider the situation where the biomarker assay and classification are possibly subject to errors. Specifically, the first stage is a randomized design, stratified by the biomarker appeared status. Depending on the result of the interim analysis and a pre-specified futility criterion, the second stage can be either enriched with only the biomarker appeared positive patients, or remain as the stratified design with both biomarker appeared positive and biomarker appeared negative patients. Compared to continuous and binary outcomes, test statistics to account for biomarker misclassification are much more complicated and require special care. We develop log-rank statistics for the interim and final analyses, with an adjustment for the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarker assay. Control of Type I error rate is achieved by considering correlations between adjusted log-rank statistics from the same and/or different stages. R code is developed to calculate critical values, global/marginal power, and sample size. Our method is illustrated with examples of a recently successful development of immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2024.2395408
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Stage Adaptive Enrichment Designs with Survival Outcomes and Adjustment for Misclassification in Predictive Biomarkers

Yong Lin, Weichung Joe Shih, Yanping Chen, Hui Quan et al.
Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Two-Stage Adaptive Enrichment Designs with Survival Outcomes and Adjustment for Misclassification in Predictive Biomarkers

Yong Lin, Weichung Joe Shih, Yanping Chen, Hui Quan, Shou‐En Lu
article en

Abstract

Biomarker enrichment clinical trial designs are versatile tools to assess the treatment effect and increase the efficiency of clinical trials. In this paper, we propose a two-stage enrichment clinical trial design with survival outcomes, and consider the situation where the biomarker assay and classification are possibly subject to errors. Specifically, the first stage is a randomized design, stratified by the biomarker appeared status. Depending on the result of the interim analysis and a pre-specified futility criterion, the second stage can be either enriched with only the biomarker appeared positive patients, or remain as the stratified design with both biomarker appeared positive and biomarker appeared negative patients. Compared to continuous and binary outcomes, test statistics to account for biomarker misclassification are much more complicated and require special care. We develop log-rank statistics for the interim and final analyses, with an adjustment for the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarker assay. Control of Type I error rate is achieved by considering correlations between adjusted log-rank statistics from the same and/or different stages. R code is developed to calculate critical values, global/marginal power, and sample size. Our method is illustrated with examples of a recently successful development of immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Statistics in Biopharmaceutical ResearchVol. 17(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Regeneron (United States) (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Sanofi (United States) (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.