High-throughput transposon mutagenesis in the family Enterobacteriaceae reveals core essential genes and rapid turnover of essentiality

The Enterobacteriaceae are a scientifically and medically important clade of bacteria, containing the model organism <i>Escherichia coli</i>, as well as major human pathogens including <i>Salmonella enterica</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>. Essential gene sets have been determined for several members of the Enterobacteriaceae, with the Keio <i>E. coli</i> single-gene deletion library often regarded as a gold standard. However, it remains unclear how gene essentiality varies between related strains and species. To investigate this, we have assembled a collection of 13 sequenced high-density transposon mutant libraries from five genera within the Enterobacteriaceae. We first assess several gene essentiality prediction approaches, investigate the effects of transposon density on essentiality prediction, and identify biases in transposon insertion sequencing data. Based on these investigations, we develop a new classifier for gene essentiality. Using this new classifier, we define a core essential genome in the Enterobacteriaceae of 201 universally essential genes. Despite the presence of a large cohort of variably essential genes, we find an absence of evidence for genus-specific essential genes. A clear example of this sporadic essentiality is given by the set of genes regulating the σE extracytoplasmic stress response, which appears to have independently acquired essentiality multiple times in the Enterobacteriaceae. Finally, we compare our essential gene sets to the natural experiment of gene loss in obligate insect endosymbionts that have emerged from within the Enterobacteriaceae. This isolates a remarkably small set of genes absolutely required for survival and identifies several instances of essential stress responses masked by redundancy in free-living bacteria.IMPORTANCEThe essential genome, that is the set of genes absolutely required to sustain life, is a core concept in genetics. Essential genes in bacteria serve as drug targets, put constraints on the engineering of biological chassis for technological or industrial purposes, and are key to constructing synthetic life. Despite decades of study, relatively little is known about how gene essentiality varies across related bacteria. In this study, we have collected gene essentiality data for 13 bacteria related to the model organism <i>Escherichia coli</i>, including several human pathogens, and investigated the conservation of essentiality. We find that approximately a third of the genes essential in any particular strain are non-essential in another related strain. Surprisingly, we do not find evidence for essential genes unique to specific genera; rather it appears a substantial fraction of the essential genome rapidly gains or loses essentiality during evolution. This suggests that essentiality is not an immutable characteristic but depends crucially on the genomic context. We illustrate this through a comparison of our essential genes in free-living bacteria to genes conserved in 34 insect endosymbionts with naturally reduced genomes, finding several cases where genes generally regarded as being important for specific stress responses appear to have become essential in endosymbionts due to a loss of functional redundancy in the genome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mBio
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01798-24
Citations
19
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-throughput transposon mutagenesis in the family Enterobacteriaceae reveals core essential genes and rapid turnover of essentiality

Fatemeh Ashari Ghomi, Lars Barquist, Nicholas R. Thomson, Moataz Abd El Ghany et al.
19 citations
mBio
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
4.21
article

High-throughput transposon mutagenesis in the family Enterobacteriaceae reveals core essential genes and rapid turnover of essentiality

Fatemeh Ashari Ghomi, Lars Barquist, Nicholas R. Thomson, Moataz Abd El Ghany, Robert A. Kingsley, Jakob Jung, Paul P. Gardner, Christine J. Boinett, Derek Pickard, Gemma C. Langridge, Amy K. Cain, Julian Parkhill
article en
19 citations

Abstract

The Enterobacteriaceae are a scientifically and medically important clade of bacteria, containing the model organism <i>Escherichia coli</i>, as well as major human pathogens including <i>Salmonella enterica</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>. Essential gene sets have been determined for several members of the Enterobacteriaceae, with the Keio <i>E. coli</i> single-gene deletion library often regarded as a gold standard. However, it remains unclear how gene essentiality varies between related strains and species. To investigate this, we have assembled a collection of 13 sequenced high-density transposon mutant libraries from five genera within the Enterobacteriaceae. We first assess several gene essentiality prediction approaches, investigate the effects of transposon density on essentiality prediction, and identify biases in transposon insertion sequencing data. Based on these investigations, we develop a new classifier for gene essentiality. Using this new classifier, we define a core essential genome in the Enterobacteriaceae of 201 universally essential genes. Despite the presence of a large cohort of variably essential genes, we find an absence of evidence for genus-specific essential genes. A clear example of this sporadic essentiality is given by the set of genes regulating the σE extracytoplasmic stress response, which appears to have independently acquired essentiality multiple times in the Enterobacteriaceae. Finally, we compare our essential gene sets to the natural experiment of gene loss in obligate insect endosymbionts that have emerged from within the Enterobacteriaceae. This isolates a remarkably small set of genes absolutely required for survival and identifies several instances of essential stress responses masked by redundancy in free-living bacteria.IMPORTANCEThe essential genome, that is the set of genes absolutely required to sustain life, is a core concept in genetics. Essential genes in bacteria serve as drug targets, put constraints on the engineering of biological chassis for technological or industrial purposes, and are key to constructing synthetic life. Despite decades of study, relatively little is known about how gene essentiality varies across related bacteria. In this study, we have collected gene essentiality data for 13 bacteria related to the model organism <i>Escherichia coli</i>, including several human pathogens, and investigated the conservation of essentiality. We find that approximately a third of the genes essential in any particular strain are non-essential in another related strain. Surprisingly, we do not find evidence for essential genes unique to specific genera; rather it appears a substantial fraction of the essential genome rapidly gains or loses essentiality during evolution. This suggests that essentiality is not an immutable characteristic but depends crucially on the genomic context. We illustrate this through a comparison of our essential genes in free-living bacteria to genes conserved in 34 insect endosymbionts with naturally reduced genomes, finding several cases where genes generally regarded as being important for specific stress responses appear to have become essential in endosymbionts due to a loss of functional redundancy in the genome.

mBioVol. 15(10)
University of East Anglia (GB), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Toronto (CA), University of Canterbury (NZ), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Würzburg (DE), Norwich Research Park (GB), Taronga Conservation Society Australia (AU), Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Quadram Institute (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology (AU), Helmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (DE), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA), University of Otago (NZ), Macquarie University (AU)
UK Research and Innovation, Royal Society Te Apārangi, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Australian Research Council, Marsden Fund
Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.