Non-Stationary ETAS Model: How It Works for External Forcing

Abstract The stationary epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is based on the important empirical laws in aftershock statistics with a self-similar feature, and is therefore useful for the statistical analysis of many common earthquake occurrence series. However, because earthquake catalogs become richer, the non-stationarity arising from geophysical heterogeneity becomes more pronounced. This article discusses the utility of a model that assumes time dependence of the first two ETAS parameters, which are sensitive to the short-term prediction. The inversion analyses of the non-stationary ETAS model in this article show heuristic results for swarm earthquakes and complex mainshock–aftershock-type seismicity. The case studies demonstrate how these parameters change quantitatively in swarm seismicity associated with slow slips, increases in pore-fluid pressure such as magma and hydrothermal fluids, stress changes associated with an earthquake motion, and interseismic-induced effects due to geological properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismological Research Letters
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240166
Citations
3
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Stationary ETAS Model: How It Works for External Forcing

Yosihiko Ogata, T Kumazawa
3 citations
Seismological Research Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.60
article

Non-Stationary ETAS Model: How It Works for External Forcing

Yosihiko Ogata, T Kumazawa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The stationary epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is based on the important empirical laws in aftershock statistics with a self-similar feature, and is therefore useful for the statistical analysis of many common earthquake occurrence series. However, because earthquake catalogs become richer, the non-stationarity arising from geophysical heterogeneity becomes more pronounced. This article discusses the utility of a model that assumes time dependence of the first two ETAS parameters, which are sensitive to the short-term prediction. The inversion analyses of the non-stationary ETAS model in this article show heuristic results for swarm earthquakes and complex mainshock–aftershock-type seismicity. The case studies demonstrate how these parameters change quantitatively in swarm seismicity associated with slow slips, increases in pore-fluid pressure such as magma and hydrothermal fluids, stress changes associated with an earthquake motion, and interseismic-induced effects due to geological properties.

Seismological Research LettersVol. 95(6)
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.