Spending and Job-Finding Impacts of Expanded Unemployment Benefits: Evidence from Administrative Micro Data

We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in US history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low-liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool. (JEL E21, E24, E32, E62, E71, G51, J65)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220973
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spending and Job-Finding Impacts of Expanded Unemployment Benefits: Evidence from Administrative Micro Data

Daniel Sullivan, Pascal Noel, Peter Ganong, Joseph Vavra et al.
17 citations
American Economic Review
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
13.55
article

Spending and Job-Finding Impacts of Expanded Unemployment Benefits: Evidence from Administrative Micro Data

Daniel Sullivan, Pascal Noel, Peter Ganong, Joseph Vavra, Fiona Greig
article en
17 citations

Abstract

We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in US history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low-liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool. (JEL E21, E24, E32, E62, E71, G51, J65)

American Economic ReviewVol. 114(9)
JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US), University of Chicago (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
13.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.