Comparative Study of Profitability Ratios of Selected FMCG Companies in India

This article is a comparative study of the profitability ratio of selected FMCG companies. The main purpose of this study is to analyze and compare profitability ratio of selected samples. This study is considered secondary data for the year from 2017-18 to 2021-22 and that collected by authentic websites. The sample selection is done by a non-probability sampling technique. Furthermore, the hypothesis are tested by one-way ANOVA. The result of hypotheses testing is that during the study period there is a significant difference between the selected ratio of selected FMCG companies. The findings of this study are that HUL, ITC and Britannia industries maintain good profit, but HUL pays a higher return on equity and is effectively utilize their capital, resources and assets compared to other companies. ITC and Britannia industries utilize the capital effectively and pay average return to their investors. The performance of Godrej consumer is very poor because they do not utilize their capital and not maintain their net profit as to why it can't provide more returns on investment. So, from an investers' point of view HUL companies are very beneficial for investment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Commerce
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56209/jommerce.v4i2.66
Primary Topic
Working Capital and Financial Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Profitability Ratios of Selected FMCG Companies in India

Sanjana Joshi
Journal of Social Commerce
Working Capital and Financial Performance
article

Comparative Study of Profitability Ratios of Selected FMCG Companies in India

Sanjana Joshi
article en

Abstract

This article is a comparative study of the profitability ratio of selected FMCG companies. The main purpose of this study is to analyze and compare profitability ratio of selected samples. This study is considered secondary data for the year from 2017-18 to 2021-22 and that collected by authentic websites. The sample selection is done by a non-probability sampling technique. Furthermore, the hypothesis are tested by one-way ANOVA. The result of hypotheses testing is that during the study period there is a significant difference between the selected ratio of selected FMCG companies. The findings of this study are that HUL, ITC and Britannia industries maintain good profit, but HUL pays a higher return on equity and is effectively utilize their capital, resources and assets compared to other companies. ITC and Britannia industries utilize the capital effectively and pay average return to their investors. The performance of Godrej consumer is very poor because they do not utilize their capital and not maintain their net profit as to why it can't provide more returns on investment. So, from an investers' point of view HUL companies are very beneficial for investment.

Journal of Social CommerceVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Working Capital and Financial Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study of Profitability Ratios of Selected FMCG Companies in India — Sanjana Joshi · Journal of Social Commerce (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS