Hemodynamic tolerability and efficacy of hemodialysis modalities in critically ill patients

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently seen in critically ill patients and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. However, the optimal dialysis modality in such patients remains controversial. We examined the hemodynamic tolerability of hemodialysis modalities in critically ill individuals with AKI. Methodology Critically ill patients with AKI who underwent Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), Sustained Low-Efficiency Diafiltration (SLEDD-f), or Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis (SLED) dialysis were included in the study. In-hospital mortality, number of dialysis sessions, number of sessions terminated pre-maturely, change in blood pressure during dialysis, and hemodynamic instability during dialysis sessions were noted. Results A total of 264 patients were included, of which 78 received Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), 62 received Sustained Low-Efficiency Diafiltration (SLEDD-f), and 124 received Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis (SLED), with a total of 682 sessions among 264 patients. The commonest cause for AKI was septic shock (32.6%, n=43). All CRRT and SLEDD-f sessions were delivered without anticoagulation, and SLED was delivered without anticoagulation in 88.7% of sessions. There was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure in CRRT compared to other modalities, with higher mortality. However, patients undergoing CRRT were more sicker. There was no significant difference between SLEDD-f and SLED in terms of outcomes. Conclusion SLEDD-f and SLED have good hemodynamic tolerability compared to CRRT. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic disturbances between SLEDD-f and SLED despite a higher proportion of patients on SLEDD-f being more critical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-024-00357-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic tolerability and efficacy of hemodialysis modalities in critically ill patients

Varun Kumar Bandi, Ramprasad Elumalai, Manikantan Shekar, Jayakumar Matcha
1 citations
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Acute Kidney Injury Research
0.34
article

Hemodynamic tolerability and efficacy of hemodialysis modalities in critically ill patients

Varun Kumar Bandi, Ramprasad Elumalai, Manikantan Shekar, Jayakumar Matcha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently seen in critically ill patients and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. However, the optimal dialysis modality in such patients remains controversial. We examined the hemodynamic tolerability of hemodialysis modalities in critically ill individuals with AKI. Methodology Critically ill patients with AKI who underwent Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), Sustained Low-Efficiency Diafiltration (SLEDD-f), or Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis (SLED) dialysis were included in the study. In-hospital mortality, number of dialysis sessions, number of sessions terminated pre-maturely, change in blood pressure during dialysis, and hemodynamic instability during dialysis sessions were noted. Results A total of 264 patients were included, of which 78 received Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), 62 received Sustained Low-Efficiency Diafiltration (SLEDD-f), and 124 received Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis (SLED), with a total of 682 sessions among 264 patients. The commonest cause for AKI was septic shock (32.6%, n=43). All CRRT and SLEDD-f sessions were delivered without anticoagulation, and SLED was delivered without anticoagulation in 88.7% of sessions. There was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure in CRRT compared to other modalities, with higher mortality. However, patients undergoing CRRT were more sicker. There was no significant difference between SLEDD-f and SLED in terms of outcomes. Conclusion SLEDD-f and SLED have good hemodynamic tolerability compared to CRRT. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic disturbances between SLEDD-f and SLED despite a higher proportion of patients on SLEDD-f being more critical.

The Egyptian Journal of Internal MedicineVol. 36(1)
Siddhartha Medical College (IN), Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.