Acting Immorally to Self-Enhance: The Role of Diagnostic Self-Deception

Consumers often behave immorally toward companies for free products and services. But will they engage in immoral behaviors, such as cheating, when the rewards are purely intrinsic (e.g., feeling smarter, healthier)? This research proposes that consumers naturally cheat for such intrinsic rewards as this allows them to deceive themselves about some positive aspect of their self-concept. That is, people falsely believe their enhanced performance is not the result of cheating but instead attributable to their inherent ability. Across four studies using a variety of cheating tasks, the results demonstrate that when the opportunity to cheat offers the intrinsic incentive of positively affecting a self-aspect, individuals perform better (i.e., cheat), engage in diagnostic self-deception, and subsequently enhance their self-perceptions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732915
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acting Immorally to Self-Enhance: The Role of Diagnostic Self-Deception

Sara Loughran Dommer
2 citations
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
article

Acting Immorally to Self-Enhance: The Role of Diagnostic Self-Deception

Sara Loughran Dommer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Consumers often behave immorally toward companies for free products and services. But will they engage in immoral behaviors, such as cheating, when the rewards are purely intrinsic (e.g., feeling smarter, healthier)? This research proposes that consumers naturally cheat for such intrinsic rewards as this allows them to deceive themselves about some positive aspect of their self-concept. That is, people falsely believe their enhanced performance is not the result of cheating but instead attributable to their inherent ability. Across four studies using a variety of cheating tasks, the results demonstrate that when the opportunity to cheat offers the intrinsic incentive of positively affecting a self-aspect, individuals perform better (i.e., cheat), engage in diagnostic self-deception, and subsequently enhance their self-perceptions.

Journal of the Association for Consumer ResearchVol. 10(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.