Cognitive graphs: Representational substrates for planning.

Making plans for upcoming actions is a computationally demanding process. To mitigate these demands, individuals can build extensive internal models of their environment-states, actions, and their sequential relationships-that allow for plans to be developed with minimal computational costs. Initially, these models reflect elaborate networks of learned associative relationships, which can be used to generate plans for reward through more iterative computations such as trajectory sampling. After sufficient experience, compressed forms of these models can efficiently capture long-range sequential structure, allowing them to be used for rapid planning even in pursuit of novel or changing rewards. Here, we review recent work on the multitude of representations that can support different forms of planning. We discuss how <i>cognitive graphs</i>, a framework with roots in both cognitive psychology and computer science, can provide a unifying view of these representations and their relationships to one another. Conceptualizing internal models as forms of graphs situates them on a spectrum where different kinds of structured sequences can be queried to support both planning and the formation of iteratively more compressed predictive representations. We discuss how each of these kinds of cognitive graphs are created during learning, and used to transfer and generalize knowledge across environments. Taken together, this review highlights the significant impact that the various associative structures of memory have on planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Decision
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000249
Citations
4
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive graphs: Representational substrates for planning.

Jungsun Yoo, Elizabeth R. Chrastil, Aaron M. Bornstein
4 citations
Decision
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
1.04
article

Cognitive graphs: Representational substrates for planning.

Jungsun Yoo, Elizabeth R. Chrastil, Aaron M. Bornstein
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Making plans for upcoming actions is a computationally demanding process. To mitigate these demands, individuals can build extensive internal models of their environment-states, actions, and their sequential relationships-that allow for plans to be developed with minimal computational costs. Initially, these models reflect elaborate networks of learned associative relationships, which can be used to generate plans for reward through more iterative computations such as trajectory sampling. After sufficient experience, compressed forms of these models can efficiently capture long-range sequential structure, allowing them to be used for rapid planning even in pursuit of novel or changing rewards. Here, we review recent work on the multitude of representations that can support different forms of planning. We discuss how <i>cognitive graphs</i>, a framework with roots in both cognitive psychology and computer science, can provide a unifying view of these representations and their relationships to one another. Conceptualizing internal models as forms of graphs situates them on a spectrum where different kinds of structured sequences can be queried to support both planning and the formation of iteratively more compressed predictive representations. We discuss how each of these kinds of cognitive graphs are created during learning, and used to transfer and generalize knowledge across environments. Taken together, this review highlights the significant impact that the various associative structures of memory have on planning.

DecisionVol. 11(4)
University of California, Irvine (US)
National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.