Do aluminum, boron, arsenic, cadmium, lipoperoxidation, and genetic polymorphism determine male fertility?
Male infertility is a world multifactorial problem modulated by environmental and genetic factors. Male aspects account for 20–50 % of infertility cases. Our results are unique because they treat the importance of components participating in the determination of male infertility (environmental and immunogenetic determinants, seminological analysis, lipoperoxidation, genetic determinants, role of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium and boron). We analyzed agents affecting male reproductive potential (aluminum, boron, cadmium, arsenic, lipid peroxidation, gene polymorphisms ( MTHFR v. C677T (rs1801133) (chromosome-1) and IL-4 v. C589T (rs2243250) (chromosome-5) in men with semen disorders (n=76) and with normozoospermia (n=87) from Central Poland. Polymorphisms of MTHFR v. C677T and IL-4 v. C589T genes indirectly shape toxic metals concentration and lipoperoxidation but do not exert direct influence on male fertility disorders (monomorphism and lack of differences in genotypes frequency). Men with genotype TT or CC ( IL-4 v. C589T ) show some differentiation in elements concentration and intensity of lipoperoxidation. Analysis of TT or CC ( IL-4 v. C589T ) genotype brought correlations with B, Al, Cd, and lipoperoxidation (P<0.05) and suggesting that mentioned factors jointly shape male reproductive capability. Toxic metals may play an important role in shaping of men genetic polymorphisms, since Cd was identified as a factor increasing risk of qualification to infertile group, predisposing to fertility disorders. B, Al and Cd may be considered as important modulators of reproductive condition. However, lipoperoxidation as an isolated predictive parameter does not produce convincing results in male reproductive potential (higher MDA concentration in healthy men). Our results may be helpful in the diagnosis of male infertility, in the reduction of idiopathic cases of unknown origin and in implementation of targeted and more effective treatment (pharmacological, hormonal). Identification of environmental stressors and their correlations with fertility disorders can help to eliminate or reduce the impact of factors unfavorable to fertility. Our results highlight the importance of environmental and immunogenetic factors in shaping of defensive potential against destruction of spermatozoa and infer a role of oxidative stress in the induction of gene polymorphisms, affecting male fertility. • B, Al, As, Cd, lipid peroxidation and genetic conditions shape male reproductive capability. • MTHFR v. C677T and IL-4 v. C589T genes indirectly shape toxic elements and lipoperoxidation. • Monomorphism of population was established in the MTHFR v. C677T gene. • CC and TT genotypes shows correlations with B, Al, As, Cd, and lipid peroxidation. • Environmental and immunogenetic factors shape defensive potential against sperm destruction.
Authors
- Natalia Kurhaluk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4669-1092)
- Marek Szymański (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-5710)
- Tomasz Stuczyñski
- Piotr Kamiński (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-6018)
- Alina Woźniak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-4796)
- Jędrzej Baszyński (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-5525)
- Emilia Stanek
- Karolina Wasilow
- Sylwia Brodzka
- Renata Grochowalska
- Halina Tkaczenko
- Sławomir Mroczkowski
Institutions
- John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
- Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology (PL)
- Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
- Meditest (PL)
- Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (PL)
- 1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic (PL)
- Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz (PL)
- University of Zielona Góra (PL)
- AGH University of Krakow (PL)
- University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Published
- 2024-08-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116919
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.07