Amelioration of fat clay treated with CNS and cohesionless soils

The present study evaluates the amelioration of fat clay by blending it with cohesive non-swelling soil (CNS) and cohesionless silty sandy soil (Kassu). The fat clay sample with a liquid limit (LL) of 50 and a plasticity index (PI) of 26 was collected from Narowal, while CNS and Kassu samples were procured from Lahore's outskirts. Geotechnical tests on the virgin soil indicated its unsuitability for construction. Laboratory tests, including modified Proctor compaction, unconfined compression, California bearing ratio (CBR), and one-dimensional consolidation, were performed on samples blended with 0-35% CNS or Kassu in 5% intervals. The LL and PI of fat clay decreased significantly with the addition of 35% CNS (LL: 50-32%, PI: 24 to 13) and Kassu (LL: 50-29%, PI: 24-12). The CBR value increased from 4 to 7%, making the blended soil suitable for subgrade use. Unconfined compression tests showed a strength increase from 102 to 185 kPa with 35% CNS and up to 140 kPa with 25% Kassu. Compaction tests revealed improved maximum dry unit weight and reduced optimum moisture content. Swell potential decreased from 4 to 1.2 and 0.26% with CNS and Kassu additions. Regression models predict swell pressure and ultimate swell potential. The study concludes that blending fat clay with CNS and Kassu significantly improves its geotechnical properties, with CNS being more effective in controlling swell characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70444-0
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amelioration of fat clay treated with CNS and cohesionless soils

Syed Zishan Ashiq, Khalid Farooq, Hassan Mujtaba, Mudassar Munir Shah et al.
Scientific Reports
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Amelioration of fat clay treated with CNS and cohesionless soils

Syed Zishan Ashiq, Khalid Farooq, Hassan Mujtaba, Mudassar Munir Shah, Abdullah Mohamed
article en

Abstract

The present study evaluates the amelioration of fat clay by blending it with cohesive non-swelling soil (CNS) and cohesionless silty sandy soil (Kassu). The fat clay sample with a liquid limit (LL) of 50 and a plasticity index (PI) of 26 was collected from Narowal, while CNS and Kassu samples were procured from Lahore's outskirts. Geotechnical tests on the virgin soil indicated its unsuitability for construction. Laboratory tests, including modified Proctor compaction, unconfined compression, California bearing ratio (CBR), and one-dimensional consolidation, were performed on samples blended with 0-35% CNS or Kassu in 5% intervals. The LL and PI of fat clay decreased significantly with the addition of 35% CNS (LL: 50-32%, PI: 24 to 13) and Kassu (LL: 50-29%, PI: 24-12). The CBR value increased from 4 to 7%, making the blended soil suitable for subgrade use. Unconfined compression tests showed a strength increase from 102 to 185 kPa with 35% CNS and up to 140 kPa with 25% Kassu. Compaction tests revealed improved maximum dry unit weight and reduced optimum moisture content. Swell potential decreased from 4 to 1.2 and 0.26% with CNS and Kassu additions. Regression models predict swell pressure and ultimate swell potential. The study concludes that blending fat clay with CNS and Kassu significantly improves its geotechnical properties, with CNS being more effective in controlling swell characteristics.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), Future University in Egypt (EG), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Dalian University (CN)
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.