Refined Bitcoin Security-Latency Under Network Delay

We study security-latency bounds for Nakamoto consensus, i.e., how secure a block is after it becomes k-deep in the chain. We improve the state-of-the-art bounds by analyzing the race between adversarial and honest chains in three different phases. We find the probability distribution of the growth of the adversarial chains under models similar to those in Guo and Ren (2022) when a target block becomes k-deep in the chain. We analyze certain properties of this race to model each phase with random walks that provide tighter bounds than the existing results. Combining all three phases provides novel upper and lower bounds for blockchains with small <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda \Delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2024.3447576
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refined Bitcoin Security-Latency Under Network Delay

Şennur Ulukuş, Mustafa Doger
4 citations
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
3.12
article

Refined Bitcoin Security-Latency Under Network Delay

Şennur Ulukuş, Mustafa Doger
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We study security-latency bounds for Nakamoto consensus, i.e., how secure a block is after it becomes k-deep in the chain. We improve the state-of-the-art bounds by analyzing the race between adversarial and honest chains in three different phases. We find the probability distribution of the growth of the adversarial chains under models similar to those in Guo and Ren (2022) when a target block becomes k-deep in the chain. We analyze certain properties of this race to model each phase with random walks that provide tighter bounds than the existing results. Combining all three phases provides novel upper and lower bounds for blockchains with small <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda \Delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>.

IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryVol. 71(4)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.