High throughput screening of airway constriction in mouse lung slices

The level of airway constriction in thin slices of lung tissue is highly variable. Owing to the labor-intensive nature of these experiments, determining the number of airways to be analyzed in order to allocate a reliable value of constriction in one mouse is challenging. Herein, a new automated device for physiology and image analysis was used to facilitate high throughput screening of airway constriction in lung slices. Airway constriction was first quantified in slices of lungs from male BALB/c mice with and without experimental asthma that were inflated with agarose through the trachea or trans-parenchymal injections. Random sampling simulations were then conducted to determine the number of airways required per mouse to quantify maximal constriction. The constriction of 45 ± 12 airways per mouse in 32 mice were analyzed. Mean maximal constriction was 37.4 ± 32.0%. The agarose inflating technique did not affect the methacholine response. However, the methacholine constriction was affected by experimental asthma (p = 0.003), shifting the methacholine concentration-response curve to the right, indicating a decreased sensitivity. Simulations then predicted that approximately 35, 16 and 29 airways per mouse are needed to quantify the maximal constriction mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation, respectively; these numbers varying between mice and with experimental asthma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71170-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High throughput screening of airway constriction in mouse lung slices

Liah Fereydoonzad, Ynuk Bossé, Magali Boucher, Cyndi Henry et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
0.55
article

High throughput screening of airway constriction in mouse lung slices

Liah Fereydoonzad, Ynuk Bossé, Magali Boucher, Cyndi Henry, Louis Gélinas, Percival J. Graham, Andrés Rojas‐Ruiz, Rosalie Packwood
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The level of airway constriction in thin slices of lung tissue is highly variable. Owing to the labor-intensive nature of these experiments, determining the number of airways to be analyzed in order to allocate a reliable value of constriction in one mouse is challenging. Herein, a new automated device for physiology and image analysis was used to facilitate high throughput screening of airway constriction in lung slices. Airway constriction was first quantified in slices of lungs from male BALB/c mice with and without experimental asthma that were inflated with agarose through the trachea or trans-parenchymal injections. Random sampling simulations were then conducted to determine the number of airways required per mouse to quantify maximal constriction. The constriction of 45 ± 12 airways per mouse in 32 mice were analyzed. Mean maximal constriction was 37.4 ± 32.0%. The agarose inflating technique did not affect the methacholine response. However, the methacholine constriction was affected by experimental asthma (p = 0.003), shifting the methacholine concentration-response curve to the right, indicating a decreased sensitivity. Simulations then predicted that approximately 35, 16 and 29 airways per mouse are needed to quantify the maximal constriction mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation, respectively; these numbers varying between mice and with experimental asthma.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.