Applying Engagement Marketing and Human-Centered Design to Cocreate a Digital Decision Support Tool for Research Participation with LGBTQIA+ Community Members

We used engagement marketing and human-centered design principles to cocreate a digital decision support tool for research participation with LGBTQIA+ community members to help them make an informed decision about joining the All of Us Research Program. Building on results from the research phase, we conducted eight problem validation and solutioning workshops with 48 LGBTQIA+ community members. Community members validated barriers to engagement with <i>All of Us</i> and brainstormed 47 potential digital solutions. We developed potential solutions into 27 concepts (descriptive text and visual storyboards) and assessed acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and engagement in a set of 10 concept testing workshops with 57 community members. We developed one of the highest rated concepts, the "Decide Later Tool," into a prototype and tested it with 45 LGBTQIA+ community members and 14 community advisory group members to assess acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, usability, and engagement. Prototype testing participants indicated that the tool provides information to help with decision making, provides a clear value or benefit to them, was designed for someone like them, provides the right amount of information, and is easy to use; they also offered constructive feedback to improve it. Across the design and development phases, community members indicated that the process of engaging them demonstrated integrity, competence, dependability, trust, and collaboration; fostered a sense of connection to <i>All of Us</i>; and will enhance future engagement with <i>All of Us</i>. Our next steps are to develop the prototype into a fully functioning web tool and pilot test it in community and health care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0689
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Engagement Marketing and Human-Centered Design to Cocreate a Digital Decision Support Tool for Research Participation with LGBTQIA+ Community Members

Daniel Moretti, Alexa Ortiz, Jennifer D. Uhrig, Allyson M. Corbo et al.
1 citations
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
0.85
article

Applying Engagement Marketing and Human-Centered Design to Cocreate a Digital Decision Support Tool for Research Participation with LGBTQIA+ Community Members

Daniel Moretti, Alexa Ortiz, Jennifer D. Uhrig, Allyson M. Corbo, Ana Rescate, Alyssa Jordan, Jill A. Brown, Marcel Foster, Megan A. Lewis, Katie Baker, Julie Gras-Najjar, Schuyler H. DeBree, Chelsea Gieck
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We used engagement marketing and human-centered design principles to cocreate a digital decision support tool for research participation with LGBTQIA+ community members to help them make an informed decision about joining the All of Us Research Program. Building on results from the research phase, we conducted eight problem validation and solutioning workshops with 48 LGBTQIA+ community members. Community members validated barriers to engagement with <i>All of Us</i> and brainstormed 47 potential digital solutions. We developed potential solutions into 27 concepts (descriptive text and visual storyboards) and assessed acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and engagement in a set of 10 concept testing workshops with 57 community members. We developed one of the highest rated concepts, the "Decide Later Tool," into a prototype and tested it with 45 LGBTQIA+ community members and 14 community advisory group members to assess acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, usability, and engagement. Prototype testing participants indicated that the tool provides information to help with decision making, provides a clear value or benefit to them, was designed for someone like them, provides the right amount of information, and is easy to use; they also offered constructive feedback to improve it. Across the design and development phases, community members indicated that the process of engaging them demonstrated integrity, competence, dependability, trust, and collaboration; fostered a sense of connection to <i>All of Us</i>; and will enhance future engagement with <i>All of Us</i>. Our next steps are to develop the prototype into a fully functioning web tool and pilot test it in community and health care settings.

Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social NetworkingVol. 27(12)
RTI International (US), Stanford Medicine (US), New York College of Health Professions (US), Stanford University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.