Data alchemy, from lab to insight: Transforming in vivo experiments into data science gold

Meta-analyses of laboratory-generated data have the potential to improve experimental protocols and offer meaningful understanding of complex biological processes.However, while development of genotype-to-phenotype statistical and predictive studies is growing, in vivogenerated data are generally employed for validation of genotypic models and are not often included as features in the analyses themselves, and rarely used on their own separate from genotypic data.Moreover, the difficulties of normalizing, cleaning, and transforming these data before analysis are multifaceted, in part due to challenges of aggregating sufficient data sets for practical use.Here, we highlight important considerations and best practices when translating data from viral pathogen in vivo studies for use in data science applications, notably statistical analyses, and machine learning (ML) approaches which we use as an illustrative example.Topics covered are applicable when studying multifactorial disease processes (such as viral pathogenicity and transmissibility) independent of the specific data analyses or programming language employed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012460
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data alchemy, from lab to insight: Transforming in vivo experiments into data science gold

Troy J. Kieran, Jessica A. Belser, Taronna R. Maines
5 citations
PLoS Pathogens
Gene expression and cancer classification
1.17
article

Data alchemy, from lab to insight: Transforming in vivo experiments into data science gold

Troy J. Kieran, Jessica A. Belser, Taronna R. Maines
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Meta-analyses of laboratory-generated data have the potential to improve experimental protocols and offer meaningful understanding of complex biological processes.However, while development of genotype-to-phenotype statistical and predictive studies is growing, in vivogenerated data are generally employed for validation of genotypic models and are not often included as features in the analyses themselves, and rarely used on their own separate from genotypic data.Moreover, the difficulties of normalizing, cleaning, and transforming these data before analysis are multifaceted, in part due to challenges of aggregating sufficient data sets for practical use.Here, we highlight important considerations and best practices when translating data from viral pathogen in vivo studies for use in data science applications, notably statistical analyses, and machine learning (ML) approaches which we use as an illustrative example.Topics covered are applicable when studying multifactorial disease processes (such as viral pathogenicity and transmissibility) independent of the specific data analyses or programming language employed.

PLoS PathogensVol. 20(8)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Gene expression and cancer classification
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data alchemy, from lab to insight: Transforming in vivo experiments into data science gold — Troy J. Kieran, Jessica A. Belser, et al. · PLoS Pathogens (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS