Talk the Talk, Walk the Walk: A Case Study on Systematic Evaluation in Participatory Design

Participatory Design (PD) has become a versatile, often-used design practice. However, its legitimacy is often criticised due to a lack of empirically backed benefits or impact. This impedes PD’s ability to convey its benefits to its stakeholders, other disciplines, and society at large, making progress in the field more difficult. One way to address these criticisms is using systematic evaluations in PD. While evaluation frameworks for PD exist, they are rarely used or built upon, and results from evaluations are seldom disseminated. Thus, this paper presents a systematic evaluation of the first year of a participatory project for developing a Virtual Reality training system as a case study. We discuss the impacts of systematic, explicit evaluations on PD practitioners, the PD community, and beyond. The work, therefore, contributes to establishing and developing evaluation as a practice in PD to enhance knowledge-building and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3666094.3666103
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Talk the Talk, Walk the Walk: A Case Study on Systematic Evaluation in Participatory Design

Emma Jaspaert, Quynh Nguyen, Birgit Harthum
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Talk the Talk, Walk the Walk: A Case Study on Systematic Evaluation in Participatory Design

Emma Jaspaert, Quynh Nguyen, Birgit Harthum
article en

Abstract

Participatory Design (PD) has become a versatile, often-used design practice. However, its legitimacy is often criticised due to a lack of empirically backed benefits or impact. This impedes PD’s ability to convey its benefits to its stakeholders, other disciplines, and society at large, making progress in the field more difficult. One way to address these criticisms is using systematic evaluations in PD. While evaluation frameworks for PD exist, they are rarely used or built upon, and results from evaluations are seldom disseminated. Thus, this paper presents a systematic evaluation of the first year of a participatory project for developing a Virtual Reality training system as a case study. We discuss the impacts of systematic, explicit evaluations on PD practitioners, the PD community, and beyond. The work, therefore, contributes to establishing and developing evaluation as a practice in PD to enhance knowledge-building and accountability.

AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), University of Salzburg (AT), Tilburg University (NL), Vienna Consulting Engineers (Austria) (AT), Institut National de Criminalistique et de Criminologie (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.