Combining proximal and remote sensing to assess ‘Calatina’ olive water status

Developing an efficient and sustainable precision irrigation strategy is crucial in contemporary agriculture. This study aimed to combine proximal and remote sensing techniques to show the benefits of using both monitoring methods, simultaneously assessing the water status and response of ‘Calatina’ olive under two distinct irrigation levels: full irrigation (FI), and drought stress (DS, -3 to -4 MPa). Stem water potential (Ψ stem ) and stomatal conductance (g s ) were monitored weekly as reference indicators of plant water status. Crop water stress index (CWSI) and stomatal conductance index (Ig) were calculated through ground-based infrared thermography. Fruit gauges were used to monitor continuously fruit growth and data were converted in fruit daily weight fluctuations (ΔW) and relative growth rate (RGR). Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference RedEdge index (NDRE), green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI), chlorophyll vegetation index (CVI), modified soil-adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI), water index (WI), normalized difference greenness index (NDGI) and green index (GI) were calculated from data collected by UAV-mounted multispectral camera. Data obtained from proximal sensing were correlated with both Ψ stem and g s , while remote sensing data were correlated only with Ψ stem . Regression analysis showed that both CWSI and Ig proved to be reliable indicators of Ψ stem and g s . Of the two fruit growth parameters, ΔW exhibited a stronger relationship, primarily with Ψ stem . Finally, NDVI, GNDVI, WI and NDRE emerged as the vegetation indices that correlated most strongly with Ψ stem , achieving high R 2 values. Combining proximal and remote sensing indices suggested two valid approaches: a more simplified one involving the use of CWSI and either NDVI or WI, and a more comprehensive one involving CWSI and ΔW as proximal indices, along with WI as a multispectral index. Further studies on combining proximal and remote sensing data will be necessary in order to find strategic combinations of sensors and establish intervention thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1448656
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining proximal and remote sensing to assess ‘Calatina’ olive water status

Alessandro Carella, Riccardo Lo Bianco, Eliseo Roma, Francesco Paolo Marra et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
2.29
article

Combining proximal and remote sensing to assess ‘Calatina’ olive water status

Alessandro Carella, Riccardo Lo Bianco, Eliseo Roma, Francesco Paolo Marra, Pietro Catania, Roberto Massenti
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Developing an efficient and sustainable precision irrigation strategy is crucial in contemporary agriculture. This study aimed to combine proximal and remote sensing techniques to show the benefits of using both monitoring methods, simultaneously assessing the water status and response of ‘Calatina’ olive under two distinct irrigation levels: full irrigation (FI), and drought stress (DS, -3 to -4 MPa). Stem water potential (Ψ stem ) and stomatal conductance (g s ) were monitored weekly as reference indicators of plant water status. Crop water stress index (CWSI) and stomatal conductance index (Ig) were calculated through ground-based infrared thermography. Fruit gauges were used to monitor continuously fruit growth and data were converted in fruit daily weight fluctuations (ΔW) and relative growth rate (RGR). Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference RedEdge index (NDRE), green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI), chlorophyll vegetation index (CVI), modified soil-adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI), water index (WI), normalized difference greenness index (NDGI) and green index (GI) were calculated from data collected by UAV-mounted multispectral camera. Data obtained from proximal sensing were correlated with both Ψ stem and g s , while remote sensing data were correlated only with Ψ stem . Regression analysis showed that both CWSI and Ig proved to be reliable indicators of Ψ stem and g s . Of the two fruit growth parameters, ΔW exhibited a stronger relationship, primarily with Ψ stem . Finally, NDVI, GNDVI, WI and NDRE emerged as the vegetation indices that correlated most strongly with Ψ stem , achieving high R 2 values. Combining proximal and remote sensing indices suggested two valid approaches: a more simplified one involving the use of CWSI and either NDVI or WI, and a more comprehensive one involving CWSI and ΔW as proximal indices, along with WI as a multispectral index. Further studies on combining proximal and remote sensing data will be necessary in order to find strategic combinations of sensors and establish intervention thresholds.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 15
University of Palermo (IT)
European Commission, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.