Multiple ways to bend the curve of biodiversity loss: An analytical framework to support transformative change

Abstract Humans are significantly impacting ecosystems worldwide. Scientists of the IPBES Global Assessment are therefore calling for a transformative change that includes all aspects of society in order to address drivers of biodiversity loss. However, these calls are rather abstract, and thus it remains unclear how this goal can be achieved. With this conceptual contribution, we present an analytical framework for evaluating existing processes of societal change which are enhancing biodiversity, and we illustrate its application using three case studies in Germany. We argue that an empirical analysis provides insights into the causal mechanisms that initiate or promote change processes. In doing so, we can draw recommendations for future transformative change processes with regard to biodiversity conservation. In our analysis, we are dealing with questions concerning the following three areas: the drivers and context of societal change processes, the change processes themselves and finally their impacts. Subsequently, we generate recommendations on how to enhance and support the process of future societal transformation that aims at biodiversity conservation: (a) Retaining co‐benefits for biodiversity with goals that are primarily focussing on other objectives; (b) harmonising biodiversity use and conservation by turning conflicts into drivers of transformation; (c) prioritising biodiversity conservation by taking advantage of windows of opportunity. With our conceptual framework, we provide an analytical tool to learn from existing processes of societal change how to support future transformative change. This is an important step that contributes to the generation of relevant knowledge of promoting transformative change for nature and people. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10690
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple ways to bend the curve of biodiversity loss: An analytical framework to support transformative change

Janina Kleemann, Tanja Sanders, Christine Fürst, Christian Schleyer et al.
1 citations
People and Nature
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.28
article

Multiple ways to bend the curve of biodiversity loss: An analytical framework to support transformative change

Janina Kleemann, Tanja Sanders, Christine Fürst, Christian Schleyer, Christian Albert, Ludwig Lettenmaier, Tanja M. Straka, Michael Kolkmann, Jennifer Hauck, Stefan Knauß, Vera Schreiner, Karsten Grunewald, Christian Poßer, Heidi Wittmer, Josef Settele, Marion Mehring, Anna S. Brietzke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Humans are significantly impacting ecosystems worldwide. Scientists of the IPBES Global Assessment are therefore calling for a transformative change that includes all aspects of society in order to address drivers of biodiversity loss. However, these calls are rather abstract, and thus it remains unclear how this goal can be achieved. With this conceptual contribution, we present an analytical framework for evaluating existing processes of societal change which are enhancing biodiversity, and we illustrate its application using three case studies in Germany. We argue that an empirical analysis provides insights into the causal mechanisms that initiate or promote change processes. In doing so, we can draw recommendations for future transformative change processes with regard to biodiversity conservation. In our analysis, we are dealing with questions concerning the following three areas: the drivers and context of societal change processes, the change processes themselves and finally their impacts. Subsequently, we generate recommendations on how to enhance and support the process of future societal transformation that aims at biodiversity conservation: (a) Retaining co‐benefits for biodiversity with goals that are primarily focussing on other objectives; (b) harmonising biodiversity use and conservation by turning conflicts into drivers of transformation; (c) prioritising biodiversity conservation by taking advantage of windows of opportunity. With our conceptual framework, we provide an analytical tool to learn from existing processes of societal change how to support future transformative change. This is an important step that contributes to the generation of relevant knowledge of promoting transformative change for nature and people. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 6(5)
University of Kassel (DE), Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Würzburg (DE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development (DE), Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (DE), Institute for Social-Ecological Research (DE), Leibniz Institute for Jewish History and Culture – Simon Dubnow (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.