Uncertainty in subject matter education—Constitutive element and fruitful instructional strategy?

Abstract Uncertainty, which is an essential element of life in globalised, mobile and digitalised post-modern societies, challenges educational institutions. Students must be empowered to deal with such uncertainty to support developing a sense of critical consciousness and agency. Drawing on the discourse of uncertainty in educational science, this qualitative secondary analysis (QSA) refers to two studies that focused on instructional ‘uncertainty-friendly’ settings in four different school subjects (biology, drama and physical education in one study and English as a foreign language in the other) to address the research question: What are students’ responses to didactically staged confrontations with disciplinary uncertainty in different subjects? In the analysed studies, the researchers established uncertainty-friendly settings as an instructional tool to foster deep learning and cognitive flexibility in K–12 students. This QSA compares students’ reactions to these settings. The findings suggest a cross-curricular pattern of student responses: In all subjects, students initially showed unspecific responses , all of which acknowledged uncertainty. In addition, students showed specific responses (i.e. the modes of juxtaposition, exploration and rejection ) as active interactions with the uncertainty of the settings. The results can further the development of uncertainty-friendly classrooms and reflection on their limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-024-00436-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty in subject matter education—Constitutive element and fruitful instructional strategy?

Claus Krieger, Ulrich Gebhard, Wolfgang Sting, Britta Lübke et al.
3 citations
Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung
Science Education and Pedagogy
6.29
article

Uncertainty in subject matter education—Constitutive element and fruitful instructional strategy?

Claus Krieger, Ulrich Gebhard, Wolfgang Sting, Britta Lübke, Elisabeth Bracker da Ponte, Ingrid Bähr, Andreas Bonnet
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Uncertainty, which is an essential element of life in globalised, mobile and digitalised post-modern societies, challenges educational institutions. Students must be empowered to deal with such uncertainty to support developing a sense of critical consciousness and agency. Drawing on the discourse of uncertainty in educational science, this qualitative secondary analysis (QSA) refers to two studies that focused on instructional ‘uncertainty-friendly’ settings in four different school subjects (biology, drama and physical education in one study and English as a foreign language in the other) to address the research question: What are students’ responses to didactically staged confrontations with disciplinary uncertainty in different subjects? In the analysed studies, the researchers established uncertainty-friendly settings as an instructional tool to foster deep learning and cognitive flexibility in K–12 students. This QSA compares students’ reactions to these settings. The findings suggest a cross-curricular pattern of student responses: In all subjects, students initially showed unspecific responses , all of which acknowledged uncertainty. In addition, students showed specific responses (i.e. the modes of juxtaposition, exploration and rejection ) as active interactions with the uncertainty of the settings. The results can further the development of uncertainty-friendly classrooms and reflection on their limitations.

Zeitschrift für BildungsforschungVol. 14(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Universität Hamburg
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Science Education and Pedagogy
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.