Specimens in the National Herbarium of Victoria, Australia (<scp>MEL</scp>) and in Naturalis Biodiversity Center of Leiden, Netherlands (L) associated with Albertini and Schweinitz's <i>Conspectus fungorum in Lusatiae superioris</i>

Abstract The fate of the fungus specimens used by Johann Baptist von Albertini and Lewis David von Schweinitz for their publication Conspectus fungorum in Lusatiae superioris has been unknown. Some 73 specimens corresponding to new taxa described in this classic mycological text were recently brought to light in the National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL) in Melbourne, Australia. Here, we document the history and provenance of these specimens and analyze them in light of archived manuscripts and correspondence. Our research confirms that the specimens at MEL can be considered original material of the names of new species described in the Conspectus . We also document several specimens that are likely original material in the Persoon fungus collection at Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Netherlands (L). Finally, we consider the potential impact of finding original material on Albertini &amp; Schweinitz names that have been neotypified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taxon
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13239
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specimens in the National Herbarium of Victoria, Australia (MEL) and in Naturalis Biodiversity Center of Leiden, Netherlands (L) associated with Albertini and Schweinitz's Conspectus fungorum in Lusatiae superioris

Tom W. May, Andrew N. Miller, Camille Truong, Ulrike Damm et al.
Taxon
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Specimens in the National Herbarium of Victoria, Australia (MEL) and in Naturalis Biodiversity Center of Leiden, Netherlands (L) associated with Albertini and Schweinitz's Conspectus fungorum in Lusatiae superioris

Tom W. May, Andrew N. Miller, Camille Truong, Ulrike Damm, Jason M. Karakehian, Donald H. Pfister, Thomas Rödel
article en

Abstract

Abstract The fate of the fungus specimens used by Johann Baptist von Albertini and Lewis David von Schweinitz for their publication Conspectus fungorum in Lusatiae superioris has been unknown. Some 73 specimens corresponding to new taxa described in this classic mycological text were recently brought to light in the National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL) in Melbourne, Australia. Here, we document the history and provenance of these specimens and analyze them in light of archived manuscripts and correspondence. Our research confirms that the specimens at MEL can be considered original material of the names of new species described in the Conspectus . We also document several specimens that are likely original material in the Persoon fungus collection at Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, Netherlands (L). Finally, we consider the potential impact of finding original material on Albertini &amp; Schweinitz names that have been neotypified.

TaxonVol. 74(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US), Royal Botanic Garden Sydney (AU), Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz (DE), Illinois Archaeological Survey (US), Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.