Soil redistribution rates along the forested and cultivated steep hillslope in the mid‐Himalayas using fallout—<scp><sup>137</sup>Cs</scp> and <scp>RUSLE</scp> model

Abstract Soil erosion emerged as a significant land degradation concern, causing serious threat to soil ecosystem services in the Himalayan region. The complex topography of the region poses limitations to the measurement of soil redistribution (erosion, transport, and deposition) rate, necessitated for the effective soil conservation planning. The study investigated soil redistribution processes over a typical complex hillslope of the mid‐Himalayan region using the fallout radionuclide (FRN)— 137 Cs method and Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model. It involved a comparison of 137 Cs measured soil redistribution and the RUSLE model estimates, aiming to assess its correspondence over the complex hillslope. Analysis of 137 Cs measurements revealed the highest net erosion (−13.2 t ha −1 year −1 ) at the upper hillslope with a convex shape, while sediment deposition occurred at the lower (36.9 t ha −1 year −1 ) and valley (32.5 t ha −1 year −1 ) hillslope positions with a concave shape. The RUSLE model also estimated the highest erosion on the upper hillslope (−12.3 t ha −1 year −1 ) but the lowest erosion at the lower (−0.88 t ha −1 year −1 ) and valley (−0.32 t ha −1 year −1 ) hillslopes, that differed with the 137 Cs method. The 137 Cs method provided soil redistribution rate (either net erosion or deposition), whereas RUSLE model only showed the gross erosion rate. Thus, the estimate from RUSLE corresponds only to hillslope positions with a convex and straight shapes. The distribution of 137 Cs measurements has clearly revealed the influence of slope shape and steepness in governing erosion and deposition processes at the hillslope positions with convex and concave slope shapes, respectively. In addition, terraces effectively trap sediments from upslope areas. Investigation of soil erosion using 137 Cs measurement along with the RUSLE model helped to validate erosion and deposition processes over the hillslope positions. The study will help to suggest suitable conservation measures for the various hillslope positions in the mid‐Himalayan region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5258
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil redistribution rates along the forested and cultivated steep hillslope in the mid‐Himalayas using fallout—137Cs and RUSLE model

K. R. Sooryamol, Suresh Kumar, Justin George Kalambukattu, Anu David Raj et al.
4 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Soil erosion and sediment transport
1.33
article

Soil redistribution rates along the forested and cultivated steep hillslope in the mid‐Himalayas using fallout—137Cs and RUSLE model

K. R. Sooryamol, Suresh Kumar, Justin George Kalambukattu, Anu David Raj, K. Sudeep Kumara
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil erosion emerged as a significant land degradation concern, causing serious threat to soil ecosystem services in the Himalayan region. The complex topography of the region poses limitations to the measurement of soil redistribution (erosion, transport, and deposition) rate, necessitated for the effective soil conservation planning. The study investigated soil redistribution processes over a typical complex hillslope of the mid‐Himalayan region using the fallout radionuclide (FRN)— 137 Cs method and Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model. It involved a comparison of 137 Cs measured soil redistribution and the RUSLE model estimates, aiming to assess its correspondence over the complex hillslope. Analysis of 137 Cs measurements revealed the highest net erosion (−13.2 t ha −1 year −1 ) at the upper hillslope with a convex shape, while sediment deposition occurred at the lower (36.9 t ha −1 year −1 ) and valley (32.5 t ha −1 year −1 ) hillslope positions with a concave shape. The RUSLE model also estimated the highest erosion on the upper hillslope (−12.3 t ha −1 year −1 ) but the lowest erosion at the lower (−0.88 t ha −1 year −1 ) and valley (−0.32 t ha −1 year −1 ) hillslopes, that differed with the 137 Cs method. The 137 Cs method provided soil redistribution rate (either net erosion or deposition), whereas RUSLE model only showed the gross erosion rate. Thus, the estimate from RUSLE corresponds only to hillslope positions with a convex and straight shapes. The distribution of 137 Cs measurements has clearly revealed the influence of slope shape and steepness in governing erosion and deposition processes at the hillslope positions with convex and concave slope shapes, respectively. In addition, terraces effectively trap sediments from upslope areas. Investigation of soil erosion using 137 Cs measurement along with the RUSLE model helped to validate erosion and deposition processes over the hillslope positions. The study will help to suggest suitable conservation measures for the various hillslope positions in the mid‐Himalayan region.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 35(16)
Forest Research Institute (IN), Indian Space Research Organisation (IN), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN), Mangalore University (IN), Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (IN), Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IN)
Indian Space Research Organisation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.