Exploring enhanced syngas production via the catalytic performance of metal‐doped X‐Ni/<scp>CeO<sub>2</sub></scp> (X = Zr, La, Sr) in the dry reforming of methane

Abstract Background The quest to manufacture large amounts of syngas to bridge fossil fuels and the renewable energy ecosystem stimulates the creation of efficient and stable heterogeneous catalysts. The NiCeO 2 catalysts, synthesized via ultrasonic‐assisted citric acid complexation, are highly efficient for the dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction. Different promoter metals (Zr, La and Sr) were tested for catalytic performance and syngas production. A range of analyses, including X‐ray diffraction (XRD), N 2 physisorption, H 2 temperature‐programmed reduction, CO 2 temperature‐programmed desorption, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, were employed to characterize the physicochemical properties of the catalysts. Results XRD results indicated the formation of NiO, CeO 2 , solid solution ceria–zirconia, perovskite LaNiO 3 and SrNiO 3 crystalline phases. FESEM results showed the promoted catalysts (Zr, La, Sr) produce large pores to facilitate reactant diffusion, with zirconia specifically creating a spiderweb morphology. At 800 °C, the CH 4 and CO 2 conversions follow the sequence of NiCeO 2 catalyst (CH 4 = 54%, CO 2 = 45%) &lt; Sr/NiCeO 2 (CH 4 = 60%, CO 2 = 67%) &lt; La/NiCeO 2 (CH 4 = 85%, CO 2 = 84%) &lt; Zr/NiCeO 2 (CH 4 = 95%, CO 2 = 87%). The integration of promoters in DRM catalysts has notably improved carbon formation resistance, as evidenced by the following ranking: Zr/NiCeO 2 (5.1 wt%) &lt; commercial catalyst (6.0 wt%) &lt; La/NiCeO 2 (7.85 wt%) &lt; Sr/NiCeO 2 (10.9 wt%) &lt; NiCeO 2 (11.3 wt%). Conclusion This study demonstrates that incorporating promoters, particularly Zr, in NiCeO 2 significantly enhances resistance to carbon formation. It offers valuable insights into selecting metal catalyst promoters for excellent catalytic performance in DRM. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7732
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring enhanced syngas production via the catalytic performance of metal‐doped X‐Ni/CeO2 (X = Zr, La, Sr) in the dry reforming of methane

Zahira Yaakob, Khairul Naim Ahmad, Yun Hin Taufiq‐Yap, Salma Samidin et al.
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.11
article

Exploring enhanced syngas production via the catalytic performance of metal‐doped X‐Ni/CeO2 (X = Zr, La, Sr) in the dry reforming of methane

Zahira Yaakob, Khairul Naim Ahmad, Yun Hin Taufiq‐Yap, Salma Samidin, Wan Nabilah Manan, Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak, Mohd Nor Latif, Ali Aldoghachi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The quest to manufacture large amounts of syngas to bridge fossil fuels and the renewable energy ecosystem stimulates the creation of efficient and stable heterogeneous catalysts. The NiCeO 2 catalysts, synthesized via ultrasonic‐assisted citric acid complexation, are highly efficient for the dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction. Different promoter metals (Zr, La and Sr) were tested for catalytic performance and syngas production. A range of analyses, including X‐ray diffraction (XRD), N 2 physisorption, H 2 temperature‐programmed reduction, CO 2 temperature‐programmed desorption, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, were employed to characterize the physicochemical properties of the catalysts. Results XRD results indicated the formation of NiO, CeO 2 , solid solution ceria–zirconia, perovskite LaNiO 3 and SrNiO 3 crystalline phases. FESEM results showed the promoted catalysts (Zr, La, Sr) produce large pores to facilitate reactant diffusion, with zirconia specifically creating a spiderweb morphology. At 800 °C, the CH 4 and CO 2 conversions follow the sequence of NiCeO 2 catalyst (CH 4 = 54%, CO 2 = 45%) &lt; Sr/NiCeO 2 (CH 4 = 60%, CO 2 = 67%) &lt; La/NiCeO 2 (CH 4 = 85%, CO 2 = 84%) &lt; Zr/NiCeO 2 (CH 4 = 95%, CO 2 = 87%). The integration of promoters in DRM catalysts has notably improved carbon formation resistance, as evidenced by the following ranking: Zr/NiCeO 2 (5.1 wt%) &lt; commercial catalyst (6.0 wt%) &lt; La/NiCeO 2 (7.85 wt%) &lt; Sr/NiCeO 2 (10.9 wt%) &lt; NiCeO 2 (11.3 wt%). Conclusion This study demonstrates that incorporating promoters, particularly Zr, in NiCeO 2 significantly enhances resistance to carbon formation. It offers valuable insights into selecting metal catalyst promoters for excellent catalytic performance in DRM. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Journal of Chemical Technology & BiotechnologyVol. 99(11)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.