Future Prospects of MeOH and EtOH Blending in Gasoline: A Comparative Study on Fossil, Biomass, and Renewable Energy Sources Considering Economic and Environmental Factors

Alcohol-blended gasoline is recognized as an effective strategy for reducing carbon emissions during combustion and enhancing fuel performance. However, the carbon footprint associated with its production process in refineries deserves equal attention. This study introduces a refinery modeling framework to evaluate the long-term economic and environmental performance of utilizing alcohols derived from fossil, biomass, and carbon capture sources in gasoline blending processes. The proposed framework integrates Extreme Learning Machine-based models for gasoline octane blending, linear programming for optimization, carbon footprint tracking, and future trends in feedstock costs and carbon taxes. The results indicate that gasoline blended with coal-based alcohol currently exhibits the best economic performance, though its carbon footprint ranges from 818.54 to 2072.89 kgCO2/t. Gasoline blended with biomass-based alcohol leads to a slight reduction in benefits and an increase in the carbon footprint. Blending gasoline with CCUM (CO2 capture and utilization to methanol) results in the lowest economic performance, with a gross margin of 8.91 CNY/toil at a 30% blending ratio, but achieves a significant 62.4% reduction in the carbon footprint. In long-term scenarios, the additional costs brought by increased carbon taxes result in negative economic performance for coal-based alcohol blending after 2040. However, cost reductions driven by technological maturity lead to biomass-based alcohol and CCUM blending gradually showing economic advantages. Furthermore, owing to the negative carbon emissions characteristic of CCUM, the blending route with CCUM achieves a gross margin of 440.60 CNY/toil and a gasoline carbon footprint of 282.28 kgCO2/t at a 20% blending ratio by 2050, making it the best route in terms of economic and environmental performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081751
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future Prospects of MeOH and EtOH Blending in Gasoline: A Comparative Study on Fossil, Biomass, and Renewable Energy Sources Considering Economic and Environmental Factors

Sikan Wu, Xiaofei Shi, Tangmao Lin, Bo Chen et al.
1 citations
Processes
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.12
article

Future Prospects of MeOH and EtOH Blending in Gasoline: A Comparative Study on Fossil, Biomass, and Renewable Energy Sources Considering Economic and Environmental Factors

Sikan Wu, Xiaofei Shi, Tangmao Lin, Bo Chen, Yujiang Fu, Zihao Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Alcohol-blended gasoline is recognized as an effective strategy for reducing carbon emissions during combustion and enhancing fuel performance. However, the carbon footprint associated with its production process in refineries deserves equal attention. This study introduces a refinery modeling framework to evaluate the long-term economic and environmental performance of utilizing alcohols derived from fossil, biomass, and carbon capture sources in gasoline blending processes. The proposed framework integrates Extreme Learning Machine-based models for gasoline octane blending, linear programming for optimization, carbon footprint tracking, and future trends in feedstock costs and carbon taxes. The results indicate that gasoline blended with coal-based alcohol currently exhibits the best economic performance, though its carbon footprint ranges from 818.54 to 2072.89 kgCO2/t. Gasoline blended with biomass-based alcohol leads to a slight reduction in benefits and an increase in the carbon footprint. Blending gasoline with CCUM (CO2 capture and utilization to methanol) results in the lowest economic performance, with a gross margin of 8.91 CNY/toil at a 30% blending ratio, but achieves a significant 62.4% reduction in the carbon footprint. In long-term scenarios, the additional costs brought by increased carbon taxes result in negative economic performance for coal-based alcohol blending after 2040. However, cost reductions driven by technological maturity lead to biomass-based alcohol and CCUM blending gradually showing economic advantages. Furthermore, owing to the negative carbon emissions characteristic of CCUM, the blending route with CCUM achieves a gross margin of 440.60 CNY/toil and a gasoline carbon footprint of 282.28 kgCO2/t at a 20% blending ratio by 2050, making it the best route in terms of economic and environmental performance.

ProcessesVol. 12(8)
Sinopec (China) (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.