Short- and Medium-Range Predictability of Warm-Season Derechos. Part I: Operational Predictability and Composites

Abstract This study analyzes the operational predictability of warm-season (May–August) progressive derechos. A subset of 47 derechos occurring between 2010 and 2022 were selected based on NCEI Storm Data and radar imagery. The Storm Prediction Center Convective Outlooks issued from 5 days before each derecho to the day of the event were used to determine whether the severe weather and derecho predictability was low, moderate, or high, for each case. The cases were also categorized based on the synoptic-scale midlevel flow pattern. Composite maps of synoptic patterns associated with the derecho cases and distributions of severe weather parameters in the derecho inflow region were generated. About 72% of the 47 derechos selected for this study were associated with low predictability, and the remainder were categorized with moderate predictability. None of the cases had high predictability. Most derechos occurring under northwest- and zonal-flow regimes (80% and 85%, respectively) had low predictability. Composites of low- and moderate-predictability derechos indicate that derechos formed in the equatorward entrance region of the upper-level jet, where low-level warm advection exists in conjunction with an equivalent potential temperature maximum. A midlevel trough is located upstream of the derecho initiation point in many of the moderate-predictability composites but is absent in the low-predictability composites, which indicates weaker synoptic-scale forcing for ascent in low-predictability cases. The distributions of severe weather parameters for low- and moderate-predictability derechos are similar, suggesting that these parameters alone are not particularly useful as a discriminator of derecho predictability. Significance Statement Derechos are characterized by swaths of damaging wind gusts caused by an organized group of long-lived convective storms. These events are more frequent in the summer and are often difficult to predict far in advance. This study analyzes a subset of derecho cases to better understand the differences between cases with lower and higher predictability. About 72% of the 47 derechos examined in this study had low predictability. In these cases, the development and maintenance of storms are typically associated with larger uncertainty, but if persistent storms do form, there is potential to produce a derecho. These findings are part of ongoing work that examines ways to improve derecho forecasts with greater lead time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0172.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short- and Medium-Range Predictability of Warm-Season Derechos. Part I: Operational Predictability and Composites

Bruno Z. Ribeiro, Lance F. Bosart, Steven J. Weiss
1 citations
Weather and Forecasting
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
0.38
article

Short- and Medium-Range Predictability of Warm-Season Derechos. Part I: Operational Predictability and Composites

Bruno Z. Ribeiro, Lance F. Bosart, Steven J. Weiss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzes the operational predictability of warm-season (May–August) progressive derechos. A subset of 47 derechos occurring between 2010 and 2022 were selected based on NCEI Storm Data and radar imagery. The Storm Prediction Center Convective Outlooks issued from 5 days before each derecho to the day of the event were used to determine whether the severe weather and derecho predictability was low, moderate, or high, for each case. The cases were also categorized based on the synoptic-scale midlevel flow pattern. Composite maps of synoptic patterns associated with the derecho cases and distributions of severe weather parameters in the derecho inflow region were generated. About 72% of the 47 derechos selected for this study were associated with low predictability, and the remainder were categorized with moderate predictability. None of the cases had high predictability. Most derechos occurring under northwest- and zonal-flow regimes (80% and 85%, respectively) had low predictability. Composites of low- and moderate-predictability derechos indicate that derechos formed in the equatorward entrance region of the upper-level jet, where low-level warm advection exists in conjunction with an equivalent potential temperature maximum. A midlevel trough is located upstream of the derecho initiation point in many of the moderate-predictability composites but is absent in the low-predictability composites, which indicates weaker synoptic-scale forcing for ascent in low-predictability cases. The distributions of severe weather parameters for low- and moderate-predictability derechos are similar, suggesting that these parameters alone are not particularly useful as a discriminator of derecho predictability. Significance Statement Derechos are characterized by swaths of damaging wind gusts caused by an organized group of long-lived convective storms. These events are more frequent in the summer and are often difficult to predict far in advance. This study analyzes a subset of derecho cases to better understand the differences between cases with lower and higher predictability. About 72% of the 47 derechos examined in this study had low predictability. In these cases, the development and maintenance of storms are typically associated with larger uncertainty, but if persistent storms do form, there is potential to produce a derecho. These findings are part of ongoing work that examines ways to improve derecho forecasts with greater lead time.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 39(12)
Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
0.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.