Development of a Two-Step EOF Statistical Postprocessing Algorithm to Identify Patterns of Systematic Error and Variance within GEFSv12 Reforecasts

Abstract Analysis of seasonally varying signals of model error biases, as well as the diagnosis of space–time patterns of synoptic error, here is accomplished through the development of a statistical postprocessing algorithm based on time-extended empirical orthogonal functions (EEOFs) built on patterns of variance. This work analyzes GEFSv12 200-hPa geopotential height (Z200) model error against ERA5 reanalysis data. The mean-square error variance between GEFSv12 reforecast and ERA5 grows rapidly after day 7 of a forecast and continues to increase through the end of the 16-day forecast period. At lead time 16, the largest variance occurs in mid- to high-latitude oceanic storm tracks. Variance is highest during hemispheric winter when baroclinic energy is abundant. The seasonal cycle of error shows largest anomalies in the high latitudes during hemispheric winter. After running the titular two-step, space–time EEOF algorithm, a standardized spatial eigenspectrum shows that eigenvalues increase at longer lead times after decreasing in the medium range, demonstrating that the algorithm extracts large-scale signals of systematic error in the long range. Leading wintertime space–time eigenmode pairs include high-latitude blocking structures and Rossby wave trains. Results suggest that the large-scale systematic errors in GEFSv12 Z200 initiate in part from inaccurate representations of phase speeds of atmospheric waves in the polar jet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0167.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical and numerical algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Two-Step EOF Statistical Postprocessing Algorithm to Identify Patterns of Systematic Error and Variance within GEFSv12 Reforecasts

Paul E. Roundy, William D. Stikeleather
1 citations
Weather and Forecasting
Statistical and numerical algorithms
0.97
article

Development of a Two-Step EOF Statistical Postprocessing Algorithm to Identify Patterns of Systematic Error and Variance within GEFSv12 Reforecasts

Paul E. Roundy, William D. Stikeleather
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Analysis of seasonally varying signals of model error biases, as well as the diagnosis of space–time patterns of synoptic error, here is accomplished through the development of a statistical postprocessing algorithm based on time-extended empirical orthogonal functions (EEOFs) built on patterns of variance. This work analyzes GEFSv12 200-hPa geopotential height (Z200) model error against ERA5 reanalysis data. The mean-square error variance between GEFSv12 reforecast and ERA5 grows rapidly after day 7 of a forecast and continues to increase through the end of the 16-day forecast period. At lead time 16, the largest variance occurs in mid- to high-latitude oceanic storm tracks. Variance is highest during hemispheric winter when baroclinic energy is abundant. The seasonal cycle of error shows largest anomalies in the high latitudes during hemispheric winter. After running the titular two-step, space–time EEOF algorithm, a standardized spatial eigenspectrum shows that eigenvalues increase at longer lead times after decreasing in the medium range, demonstrating that the algorithm extracts large-scale signals of systematic error in the long range. Leading wintertime space–time eigenmode pairs include high-latitude blocking structures and Rossby wave trains. Results suggest that the large-scale systematic errors in GEFSv12 Z200 initiate in part from inaccurate representations of phase speeds of atmospheric waves in the polar jet.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 39(11)
Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Statistical and numerical algorithms
0.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.