Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer—Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC)

Imaging for prostate cancer defines the extent of disease. Guidelines recommend against imaging low-risk prostate cancer patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan or bone scan due to the low probability of metastasis. We reviewed imaging performed for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer across the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), a physician-led data sharing and quality improvement collaborative. The data of 10 practices were queried regarding the imaging performed in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2015 to 2022. The cohort included 13,122 patients with 3502 (27%) low-risk, 2364 (18%) favorable intermediate-risk, 3585 (27%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 3671 (28%) high-risk prostate cancer, based on the AUA guidelines. Amongst the low-risk patients, imaging utilization included pelvic MRI (59.7%), bone scan (17.8%), CT (16.0%), and PET-based imaging (0.5%). Redundant imaging occurred in 1022 patients (29.2%). There was variability among the PURC sites for imaging used in the low-risk patients, and iterative education reduced the need for CT and bone scans. Approximately 15% of low-risk patients had staging imaging performed using either a CT or bone scan, and redundant imaging occurred in almost one-third of men. Such data underscore the need for continued guideline-based education to optimize the stewardship of resources and reduce unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080354
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer—Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC)

Laurence Belkoff, Thomas J. Guzzo, Serge Ginzburg, E. G. Zook et al.
Current Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer—Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC)

Laurence Belkoff, Thomas J. Guzzo, Serge Ginzburg, E. G. Zook, Raidizon Mercedes, Robert G. Uzzo, Bruce L. Jacobs, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Mihir Shah, Eric Eidelman, Adam C. Reese, John Danella, Daniel Lee, Jeffrey Walker, Jay D. Raman, Dennis Head, Marc C. Smaldone
article en

Abstract

Imaging for prostate cancer defines the extent of disease. Guidelines recommend against imaging low-risk prostate cancer patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan or bone scan due to the low probability of metastasis. We reviewed imaging performed for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer across the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), a physician-led data sharing and quality improvement collaborative. The data of 10 practices were queried regarding the imaging performed in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2015 to 2022. The cohort included 13,122 patients with 3502 (27%) low-risk, 2364 (18%) favorable intermediate-risk, 3585 (27%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 3671 (28%) high-risk prostate cancer, based on the AUA guidelines. Amongst the low-risk patients, imaging utilization included pelvic MRI (59.7%), bone scan (17.8%), CT (16.0%), and PET-based imaging (0.5%). Redundant imaging occurred in 1022 patients (29.2%). There was variability among the PURC sites for imaging used in the low-risk patients, and iterative education reduced the need for CT and bone scans. Approximately 15% of low-risk patients had staging imaging performed using either a CT or bone scan, and redundant imaging occurred in almost one-third of men. Such data underscore the need for continued guideline-based education to optimize the stewardship of resources and reduce unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.

Current OncologyVol. 31(8)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Einstein Healthcare Network (US), Temple University Hospital (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), Cooper University Health Care (US), Geisinger Health System (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.