Grouping sounds into evolving units for the purpose of historical language comparison

<ns4:p>Computer-assisted approaches to historical language comparison have made great progress during the past two decades. Scholars can now routinely use computational tools to annotate cognate sets, align words, and search for regularly recurring sound correspondences. However, computational approaches still suffer from a very rigid sequence model of the form part of the linguistic sign, in which words and morphemes are segmented into fixed sound units which cannot be modified. In order to bring the representation of sound sequences in computational historical linguistics closer to the research practice of scholars who apply the traditional comparative method, we introduce improved sound sequence representations in which individual sound segments can be grouped into evolving sound units in order to capture language-specific sound laws more efficiently. We illustrate the usefulness of this enhanced representation of sound sequences in concrete examples and complement it by providing a small software library that allows scholars to convert their data from forms segmented into sound units to forms segmented into evolving sound units and vice versa.</ns4:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16839.2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grouping sounds into evolving units for the purpose of historical language comparison

Nathan W. Hill, Johann‐Mattis List, Frederic Blum, Cristian Juárez
1 citations
Open Research Europe
Language and cultural evolution
4.29
article

Grouping sounds into evolving units for the purpose of historical language comparison

Nathan W. Hill, Johann‐Mattis List, Frederic Blum, Cristian Juárez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<ns4:p>Computer-assisted approaches to historical language comparison have made great progress during the past two decades. Scholars can now routinely use computational tools to annotate cognate sets, align words, and search for regularly recurring sound correspondences. However, computational approaches still suffer from a very rigid sequence model of the form part of the linguistic sign, in which words and morphemes are segmented into fixed sound units which cannot be modified. In order to bring the representation of sound sequences in computational historical linguistics closer to the research practice of scholars who apply the traditional comparative method, we introduce improved sound sequence representations in which individual sound segments can be grouped into evolving sound units in order to capture language-specific sound laws more efficiently. We illustrate the usefulness of this enhanced representation of sound sequences in concrete examples and complement it by providing a small software library that allows scholars to convert their data from forms segmented into sound units to forms segmented into evolving sound units and vice versa.</ns4:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 4
University of Passau (DE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Language and cultural evolution
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.