Predicting Resistance to Immunotherapy in Melanoma, Glioblastoma, Renal, Stomach and Bladder Cancers by Machine Learning on Immune Profiles

Strategies for tackling cancer involve surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICB). However, the effectiveness of ICB remains constrained, prompting the need for a proactive strategy to foresee treatment responses and resistances. This study undertook an analysis across diverse cancer patient cohorts (including melanoma, clear cell renal carcinoma, glioblastoma, bladder, and stomach cancers) subjected to various immune checkpoint blockade treatments. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled that over 38% of patients demonstrated resistance and persistent disease progression despite undergoing ICB intervention. To unravel the intricacies of resistance, we scrutinized the immune profiles of cancer patients experiencing ongoing disease progression and resistance post-ICB therapy. These profiles delineated multifaceted defects, including compromised macrophage, monocyte, and T cell responses, impaired antigen presentation, aberrant regulatory T cell (Tregs) responses, and an elevated expression of immunosuppressive and G protein-coupled receptor molecules (TGFB1, IL2RA, IL1B, EDNRB, ADORA2A, SELP, and CD276). Building upon these insights into resistance profiles, we harnessed machine learning algorithms to construct models predicting the response and resistance to ICB and developed the accompanying software. While previous work on glioblastoma with only one type of algorithm had an accuracy of 0.82, we managed to develop 20 models that provided estimates of future events of resistance or response in five cancer types, with accuracies ranging between 0.79 and 1, based on their distinct immune characteristics. In conclusion, our approach advocates for the personalized application of immunotherapy in cancer patients based on patient-specific attributes and computational models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Onco
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/onco4030014
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Resistance to Immunotherapy in Melanoma, Glioblastoma, Renal, Stomach and Bladder Cancers by Machine Learning on Immune Profiles

Guillaume Mestrallet
3 citations
Onco
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.85
article

Predicting Resistance to Immunotherapy in Melanoma, Glioblastoma, Renal, Stomach and Bladder Cancers by Machine Learning on Immune Profiles

Guillaume Mestrallet
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Strategies for tackling cancer involve surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICB). However, the effectiveness of ICB remains constrained, prompting the need for a proactive strategy to foresee treatment responses and resistances. This study undertook an analysis across diverse cancer patient cohorts (including melanoma, clear cell renal carcinoma, glioblastoma, bladder, and stomach cancers) subjected to various immune checkpoint blockade treatments. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled that over 38% of patients demonstrated resistance and persistent disease progression despite undergoing ICB intervention. To unravel the intricacies of resistance, we scrutinized the immune profiles of cancer patients experiencing ongoing disease progression and resistance post-ICB therapy. These profiles delineated multifaceted defects, including compromised macrophage, monocyte, and T cell responses, impaired antigen presentation, aberrant regulatory T cell (Tregs) responses, and an elevated expression of immunosuppressive and G protein-coupled receptor molecules (TGFB1, IL2RA, IL1B, EDNRB, ADORA2A, SELP, and CD276). Building upon these insights into resistance profiles, we harnessed machine learning algorithms to construct models predicting the response and resistance to ICB and developed the accompanying software. While previous work on glioblastoma with only one type of algorithm had an accuracy of 0.82, we managed to develop 20 models that provided estimates of future events of resistance or response in five cancer types, with accuracies ranging between 0.79 and 1, based on their distinct immune characteristics. In conclusion, our approach advocates for the personalized application of immunotherapy in cancer patients based on patient-specific attributes and computational models.

OncoVol. 4(3)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.