Building culturally meaningful chronologies: negotiating Indigenous and Western temporalities in Oceania

ABSTRACT This paper examines some of the ways in which Indigenous and Western archaeological chronologies are being negotiated and entwined in Oceania. Indigenous pasts are often known through oral traditions, genealogies and ancestral landscapes; these are vital pasts populated by the ancestors. The archaeological past is often interpreted through taphonomy, stratigraphy and direct dating techniques. There are tensions and intersections between these perspectives, and research partnerships between archaeologists and Indigenous communities must negotiate how to build chronologies and narrate the past. Drawing on case studies from our research in Australia and Papua New Guinea, we discuss how these seemingly different ways of knowing the past can be brought into productive conversation and how these understandings are transforming today. We argue that incorporating diverse temporalities for ancestral places can generate richer historical narratives of value to communities and researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5333
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building culturally meaningful chronologies: negotiating Indigenous and Western temporalities in Oceania

Lynette Russell, Chris Urwin, Robert Skelly
1 citations
Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
1.96
article

Building culturally meaningful chronologies: negotiating Indigenous and Western temporalities in Oceania

Lynette Russell, Chris Urwin, Robert Skelly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines some of the ways in which Indigenous and Western archaeological chronologies are being negotiated and entwined in Oceania. Indigenous pasts are often known through oral traditions, genealogies and ancestral landscapes; these are vital pasts populated by the ancestors. The archaeological past is often interpreted through taphonomy, stratigraphy and direct dating techniques. There are tensions and intersections between these perspectives, and research partnerships between archaeologists and Indigenous communities must negotiate how to build chronologies and narrate the past. Drawing on case studies from our research in Australia and Papua New Guinea, we discuss how these seemingly different ways of knowing the past can be brought into productive conversation and how these understandings are transforming today. We argue that incorporating diverse temporalities for ancestral places can generate richer historical narratives of value to communities and researchers.

Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in OceaniaVol. 59(3)
Australian Research Council (AU), Monash University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.