Interactive effects of water deficit and nitrogen deficiency on photosynthesis, its underlying component processes, and carbon loss processes in cotton

Abstract Drought stress and nitrogen (N) deficiency are important abiotic stresses that severely limit net photosynthetic rate ( A N ). A number of studies have investigated the underlying physiological limitations to A N in response to water deficit or N deficiency; however, the relative sensitivities of photosynthetic component processes and carbon loss processes to combined drought and N deficiency in field‐grown cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) have not been explored. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the effects of combined water deficit and nitrogen deficiency on the underlying physiological processes driving A N in field‐grown cotton. Water‐deficit stress caused substantial reductions in A N , but reductions in A N were greater under optimum N conditions (74%) than under N deficiency (22%). Decreased CO 2 diffusion, RuBP regeneration, and Rubisco carboxylation were major contributors to a decline in A N due to water‐deficit stress. Reductions in Rubisco carboxylation and RuBP regeneration were the greatest drivers of N deficiency‐induced decline in A N . Lower CO 2 diffusion and Rubisco carboxylation were main constraints to A N due to combined water deficit and N deficiency. Regarding carbon loss processes, both dark respiration and photorespiration under water‐deficit stress or N deficiency, and only photorespiration under combined water deficit and N deficiency, contributed to declines in A N . Increased non‐photochemical quenching and/or photorespiration prevented photoinhibition of photosystem II under stress conditions. Overall, response of photosynthesis to water‐deficit stress was dependent on N availability, and rate‐limiting physiological processes contributing to declines in A N were dependent on the type of prevailing stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Science
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21328
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactive effects of water deficit and nitrogen deficiency on photosynthesis, its underlying component processes, and carbon loss processes in cotton

Gurpreet Virk, Ved Parkash, John L. Snider
3 citations
Crop Science
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
0.85
article

Interactive effects of water deficit and nitrogen deficiency on photosynthesis, its underlying component processes, and carbon loss processes in cotton

Gurpreet Virk, Ved Parkash, John L. Snider
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Drought stress and nitrogen (N) deficiency are important abiotic stresses that severely limit net photosynthetic rate ( A N ). A number of studies have investigated the underlying physiological limitations to A N in response to water deficit or N deficiency; however, the relative sensitivities of photosynthetic component processes and carbon loss processes to combined drought and N deficiency in field‐grown cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) have not been explored. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the effects of combined water deficit and nitrogen deficiency on the underlying physiological processes driving A N in field‐grown cotton. Water‐deficit stress caused substantial reductions in A N , but reductions in A N were greater under optimum N conditions (74%) than under N deficiency (22%). Decreased CO 2 diffusion, RuBP regeneration, and Rubisco carboxylation were major contributors to a decline in A N due to water‐deficit stress. Reductions in Rubisco carboxylation and RuBP regeneration were the greatest drivers of N deficiency‐induced decline in A N . Lower CO 2 diffusion and Rubisco carboxylation were main constraints to A N due to combined water deficit and N deficiency. Regarding carbon loss processes, both dark respiration and photorespiration under water‐deficit stress or N deficiency, and only photorespiration under combined water deficit and N deficiency, contributed to declines in A N . Increased non‐photochemical quenching and/or photorespiration prevented photoinhibition of photosystem II under stress conditions. Overall, response of photosynthesis to water‐deficit stress was dependent on N availability, and rate‐limiting physiological processes contributing to declines in A N were dependent on the type of prevailing stress.

Crop ScienceVol. 64(6)
University of Georgia (US)
Cotton Incorporated, Georgia Cotton Commission
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.