Egy botrányos példázat – a szőlőmunkások (Mt 20,1-16)

We always take risk when we analyse biblical texts in order to reach its original setting and message. But this endevoir can be fruitful, as the problems surrounding the tenant worker’s parable clearly demonstrates. The interpretations of the church – throughout her whole history – unfortunatelly covered the scandal in this piece of artwork, and the problem of unjust payment has been explained as „radical grace”, as the result of the first worker’s laziness, bad attitude or the diligence of the latecomers. These misinterpretations do not make justice to the text. No explanation can cast shadow on the visible moral dilemma. The grapeyard owner throught Mediterranian eyes does not deserve sympathy, his deed cannot be excused. We got used to look at this story from the viewpoint of the last hired laborers. We are thankful for such a grace – but the parable forces us to the role of the first workers, who legitimately protest against the disproportionate wage. Only through our indignation, dispise, annoyment can we arrive to the real understanding, accepting that we would never act like the owner, that according to our measures and ideals this act is a scandal. Only after this confession can we arrive to the last workers – and to the undeserved and disturbing grace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sárospataki füzetek
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59914/sf.28.2024.2.8
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Egy botrányos példázat – a szőlőmunkások (Mt 20,1-16)

György Kustár
Sárospataki füzetek
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Egy botrányos példázat – a szőlőmunkások (Mt 20,1-16)

György Kustár
article en

Abstract

We always take risk when we analyse biblical texts in order to reach its original setting and message. But this endevoir can be fruitful, as the problems surrounding the tenant worker’s parable clearly demonstrates. The interpretations of the church – throughout her whole history – unfortunatelly covered the scandal in this piece of artwork, and the problem of unjust payment has been explained as „radical grace”, as the result of the first worker’s laziness, bad attitude or the diligence of the latecomers. These misinterpretations do not make justice to the text. No explanation can cast shadow on the visible moral dilemma. The grapeyard owner throught Mediterranian eyes does not deserve sympathy, his deed cannot be excused. We got used to look at this story from the viewpoint of the last hired laborers. We are thankful for such a grace – but the parable forces us to the role of the first workers, who legitimately protest against the disproportionate wage. Only through our indignation, dispise, annoyment can we arrive to the real understanding, accepting that we would never act like the owner, that according to our measures and ideals this act is a scandal. Only after this confession can we arrive to the last workers – and to the undeserved and disturbing grace.

Sárospataki füzetekVol. 28(2)
Sárospatak Reformed Theological University (HU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.