PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS REGRESI LOGISTIK BINER DAN NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI FAKTOR RESIKO DIABETES

Diabetes is a global health problem that is increasing in prevalence worldwide. This study compares the performance of two data analysis methods, namely binary logistic regression and naïve bayes classifier in predicting diabetes risk. This study aims to identify factors that significantly affect diabetes risk and classify diabetes risk using binary logistic regression, then compare the classification with the naive bayes classifier algorithm. Binary logistic regression models the relationship between independent predictor variables and binary dependent variables, while naïve bayes classifier uses the assumption of independence between variables. In this study, both methods were evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. The results show that the factors that influence the risk of diabetes are Age, Gender, Polyuria, Polydipsia, Genital thrush, Itching, Irritability, and Partial paresis. Furthermore, the binary logistic regression results have a higher classification accuracy (92.31%) compared to the naïve bayes classifier (84.61%). Therefore, binary logistic regression was identified as the best method to predict diabetes risk in the context of this study

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Lebesgue Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Matematika dan Statistika
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v5i2.617
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS REGRESI LOGISTIK BINER DAN NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI FAKTOR RESIKO DIABETES

Erfiani Erfiani, Anwar Fitrianto, A. A. Muftih, Rafika Aristawidya et al.
Jurnal Lebesgue Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Matematika dan Statistika
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
article

PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS REGRESI LOGISTIK BINER DAN NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI FAKTOR RESIKO DIABETES

Erfiani Erfiani, Anwar Fitrianto, A. A. Muftih, Rafika Aristawidya, Indahwati Indahwati
article en

Abstract

Diabetes is a global health problem that is increasing in prevalence worldwide. This study compares the performance of two data analysis methods, namely binary logistic regression and naïve bayes classifier in predicting diabetes risk. This study aims to identify factors that significantly affect diabetes risk and classify diabetes risk using binary logistic regression, then compare the classification with the naive bayes classifier algorithm. Binary logistic regression models the relationship between independent predictor variables and binary dependent variables, while naïve bayes classifier uses the assumption of independence between variables. In this study, both methods were evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. The results show that the factors that influence the risk of diabetes are Age, Gender, Polyuria, Polydipsia, Genital thrush, Itching, Irritability, and Partial paresis. Furthermore, the binary logistic regression results have a higher classification accuracy (92.31%) compared to the naïve bayes classifier (84.61%). Therefore, binary logistic regression was identified as the best method to predict diabetes risk in the context of this study

Jurnal Lebesgue Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Matematika dan StatistikaVol. 5(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.