3D Recording of Palaeolithic Rock Art through Different Techniques: a Critical Comparison and Evaluation

Palaeolithic graphic activity documentation is essential not only for its preservation and dissemination but also for its scientific analysis. Nowadays, researchers can use advanced techniques such as photogrammetry, lidar, or structured light scanning to record this heritage. However, there is a lack of studies comparing these three technologies. Therefore, this article presents a comparison of these techniques based on three variables: namely, time employed, geometric reconstruction, and resolution. The study examines how these factors affect the final result of the digital recording of rock art. A mold of Rock 11 from Domingo García (Segovia, Spain) and the archaeological panel S.4 from La Salud (Salamanca, Spain) have been used as test control examples. The results indicate that photogrammetry using a DSLR camera is the most efficient technique, providing the necessary reconstruction to obtain scientific data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Field Archaeology
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2024.2392972
Citations
4
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D Recording of Palaeolithic Rock Art through Different Techniques: a Critical Comparison and Evaluation

Miguel García‐Bustos, Ana María Mateo-Pellitero, Olivia Rivero, Xabier Eguilleor-Carmona
4 citations
Journal of Field Archaeology
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
3.34
article

3D Recording of Palaeolithic Rock Art through Different Techniques: a Critical Comparison and Evaluation

Miguel García‐Bustos, Ana María Mateo-Pellitero, Olivia Rivero, Xabier Eguilleor-Carmona
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Palaeolithic graphic activity documentation is essential not only for its preservation and dissemination but also for its scientific analysis. Nowadays, researchers can use advanced techniques such as photogrammetry, lidar, or structured light scanning to record this heritage. However, there is a lack of studies comparing these three technologies. Therefore, this article presents a comparison of these techniques based on three variables: namely, time employed, geometric reconstruction, and resolution. The study examines how these factors affect the final result of the digital recording of rock art. A mold of Rock 11 from Domingo García (Segovia, Spain) and the archaeological panel S.4 from La Salud (Salamanca, Spain) have been used as test control examples. The results indicate that photogrammetry using a DSLR camera is the most efficient technique, providing the necessary reconstruction to obtain scientific data.

Journal of Field ArchaeologyVol. 49(7)
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.