From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: A motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) as an accelerating global phenomenon that must be addressed. According to the WHO, thirty to fifty percent of the world's population are VH. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style demonstrated to significantly reduce VH. MI guides people toward change through the expression of empathy and by respecting an individual's autonomy. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are the primary implementors of vaccine policies and the most trusted advisors and influencers of vaccination intention at the individual patient level. Training HCPs in MI is one of the most effective strategies to overcome VH. Many countries are currently implementing HCP training programs and population-based MI interventions to improve vaccine uptake. MI conversations are 'the heart' of vaccine decision-making processes. Understanding individual patient-level drivers of hesitancy allows clinicians to efficiently provide tailored, accurate information that reinforces a person's own motivation and confidence in their own decision. This paper describes a 4-step practical framework designed to support HCPs in their dialogue with vaccine-hesitant patients. (1) <b>Engaging</b> to establish a trustful relationship and safety to freely express opinions, beliefs, and knowledge gaps; (2) <b>Understanding <i>what matters</i></b> most to the individual; (3) <b>Offering Information</b> to co-build accurate knowledge in order to guide the individual toward vaccine intention (4) <b>Clarifying and Accepting</b> to validate an individual's decision-making autonomy. We believe that our pragmatic approach can contribute to greater acceptability of COVID-19 and other vaccines, and enable rapid deployment of practical MI skills across care systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2391625
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: A motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling

Damara Gutnick, Stephen Rollnick, Patrick Berthiaume, Arnaud Gagneur et al.
25 citations
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
13.20
article

From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: A motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling

Damara Gutnick, Stephen Rollnick, Patrick Berthiaume, Arnaud Gagneur, Prantik Saha, Alessandro Diana
article en
25 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) as an accelerating global phenomenon that must be addressed. According to the WHO, thirty to fifty percent of the world's population are VH. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style demonstrated to significantly reduce VH. MI guides people toward change through the expression of empathy and by respecting an individual's autonomy. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are the primary implementors of vaccine policies and the most trusted advisors and influencers of vaccination intention at the individual patient level. Training HCPs in MI is one of the most effective strategies to overcome VH. Many countries are currently implementing HCP training programs and population-based MI interventions to improve vaccine uptake. MI conversations are 'the heart' of vaccine decision-making processes. Understanding individual patient-level drivers of hesitancy allows clinicians to efficiently provide tailored, accurate information that reinforces a person's own motivation and confidence in their own decision. This paper describes a 4-step practical framework designed to support HCPs in their dialogue with vaccine-hesitant patients. (1) <b>Engaging</b> to establish a trustful relationship and safety to freely express opinions, beliefs, and knowledge gaps; (2) <b>Understanding <i>what matters</i></b> most to the individual; (3) <b>Offering Information</b> to co-build accurate knowledge in order to guide the individual toward vaccine intention (4) <b>Clarifying and Accepting</b> to validate an individual's decision-making autonomy. We believe that our pragmatic approach can contribute to greater acceptability of COVID-19 and other vaccines, and enable rapid deployment of practical MI skills across care systems.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 20(1)
University of Geneva (CH), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes (CH), Columbia University (US), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
13.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.