Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality

Abstract We examine the relationship between corruption and income inequality across countries. While previous studies have explored this association at both an international and within‐country level, we expand on this literature in two distinct ways. First, along with the most commonly utilized measure of inequality (Gini coefficients), we also examine income per‐capita at each decile, along with top 1% and 5%, and the associated income shares. Second, we employ an empirical strategy that differs from the existing literature. Our primary results are estimated using matching methods, but we also supplement these results with a “doubly robust” difference‐in‐difference design. We find that a reduction in corruption increases incomes of the top 80% but does not significantly impact incomes of the bottom 20%, or the top 1% and 5%. We find some evidence of income growth amongst the top 1% and 5% following increases in corruption, but these results are inconsistent across estimations. Our results also suggest that accounting for the size of the informal sector matters a great deal in understanding the relationship between corruption and the distribution of income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southern Economic Journal
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12733
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality

Justin T Callais, Jamie Bologna Pavlik
4 citations
Southern Economic Journal
Corruption and Economic Development
4.53
article

Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality

Justin T Callais, Jamie Bologna Pavlik
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine the relationship between corruption and income inequality across countries. While previous studies have explored this association at both an international and within‐country level, we expand on this literature in two distinct ways. First, along with the most commonly utilized measure of inequality (Gini coefficients), we also examine income per‐capita at each decile, along with top 1% and 5%, and the associated income shares. Second, we employ an empirical strategy that differs from the existing literature. Our primary results are estimated using matching methods, but we also supplement these results with a “doubly robust” difference‐in‐difference design. We find that a reduction in corruption increases incomes of the top 80% but does not significantly impact incomes of the bottom 20%, or the top 1% and 5%. We find some evidence of income growth amongst the top 1% and 5% following increases in corruption, but these results are inconsistent across estimations. Our results also suggest that accounting for the size of the informal sector matters a great deal in understanding the relationship between corruption and the distribution of income.

Southern Economic JournalVol. 91(3)
Texas Tech University (US), University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US)
Tulane University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corruption and Economic Development
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.