The National Electrical Safety Code, powerline clearances, and wildfires

Abstract The provisions of the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) have a long, but undocumented history. They are the primary means by which Public Utilities Commission agencies in various States in the United States enforce requirements for electrical clearances pertinent to high‐voltage powerlines. Examination of the NESC provisions for clearances between grounded guy wires and distribution phase conductors in the context of the Woolsey Fire indicates a comprehensive lack of realism in the Code provisions. While they may be entirely sufficient to prevent sparkover under normal operating conditions, they are wholly insufficient to cope with even modest adverse events. The profession should consider explicitly assessing factors beyond sparkover that affect the adequacy of clearance requirements. The provisions of the NESC (and California's parallel General Order No. 95) should be systematically reexamined in order to ensure that safety regulations can cope with adverse events that are serious, but not extreme. Since the vast majority of the electrical power network is aging and not new construction, a scheme should be developed to establish priorities for upgrading existing facilities at the highest risk of failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire and Materials
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.3237
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The National Electrical Safety Code, powerline clearances, and wildfires

Vytenis Babrauskas
2 citations
Fire and Materials
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.57
article

The National Electrical Safety Code, powerline clearances, and wildfires

Vytenis Babrauskas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The provisions of the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) have a long, but undocumented history. They are the primary means by which Public Utilities Commission agencies in various States in the United States enforce requirements for electrical clearances pertinent to high‐voltage powerlines. Examination of the NESC provisions for clearances between grounded guy wires and distribution phase conductors in the context of the Woolsey Fire indicates a comprehensive lack of realism in the Code provisions. While they may be entirely sufficient to prevent sparkover under normal operating conditions, they are wholly insufficient to cope with even modest adverse events. The profession should consider explicitly assessing factors beyond sparkover that affect the adequacy of clearance requirements. The provisions of the NESC (and California's parallel General Order No. 95) should be systematically reexamined in order to ensure that safety regulations can cope with adverse events that are serious, but not extreme. Since the vast majority of the electrical power network is aging and not new construction, a scheme should be developed to establish priorities for upgrading existing facilities at the highest risk of failure.

Fire and MaterialsVol. 49(5)
John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.