Quod se emisse diceret: Überlegungen zu einer Urkunde aus dem antiken London

Summary In 1996, Roger Tomlin published a document from ancient London ( rib ii 2443.19), which contains a professional Latin legal text. It mentions a purchase transaction, but it is not a deed of sale. The expressions used ( cum ventum esset, in rem praesentem, se emisse dicetur, testatus est se ) rather indicate an extrajudicial, pre-trial context. The interpretation proposed here builds on the results of recent research in Roman law of procedure. Several indications suggest that the tabula records a preparatory act for future trial between the protagonists: Bellicus (the pursuer) bindingly declares that he is ready to take an extrajudicial oath concerning a contract of sale with his opponent, about this he can produce no other evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20241201
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quod se emisse diceret: Überlegungen zu einer Urkunde aus dem antiken London

Èva Jakab
Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
Legal principles and applications
article

Quod se emisse diceret: Überlegungen zu einer Urkunde aus dem antiken London

Èva Jakab
article en

Abstract

Summary In 1996, Roger Tomlin published a document from ancient London ( rib ii 2443.19), which contains a professional Latin legal text. It mentions a purchase transaction, but it is not a deed of sale. The expressions used ( cum ventum esset, in rem praesentem, se emisse dicetur, testatus est se ) rather indicate an extrajudicial, pre-trial context. The interpretation proposed here builds on the results of recent research in Roman law of procedure. Several indications suggest that the tabula records a preparatory act for future trial between the protagonists: Bellicus (the pursuer) bindingly declares that he is ready to take an extrajudicial oath concerning a contract of sale with his opponent, about this he can produce no other evidence.

Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History ReviewVol. 92(1-2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.