Assessment of mini-aesthetics in Class I malocclusion subjects who underwent orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of four premolars – A prospective study

Smile and facial attractiveness are strongly correlatedThis study aimed to assess the effect of extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment on mini-aesthetics in patients with Class I malocclusion by measurement of the smile variables. A total of 56 subjects were selected and grouped as Group 1- treated non-extraction, Group 2A-treated with extraction of first premolars and groups 2B- treated with extraction of second premolar teeth. Each subject was photographed with a posed smile and NHP using DSLR camera. The images were then imported into a computer software and the following smile parameters were assessed: gingival display, smile index, maxillary incisor display on smile and buccal corridor ratio. The mean measured maxillary incisor display was 1.39±0.34, 2.31±0.50 and 0.90±0.19mm in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured gingival display on smiling was 0.07±0.07, 0.38±0.65 and 0.07±0.15mm in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured smile index was 0.15±0.68, 1.20±0.22 and 0.95±0.41 in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured buccal corridor ratio was 0.83±0.39, 1.59±0.26 and 1.26±0.31 in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. There was an increase in maxillary incisor display after fixed Orthodontic treatment in the non-extraction group and a decrease in first premolar extraction group while second premolar extraction group showed no changes. Smile index was increased post-treatment in first premolar and second premolar extraction group while non-extraction group showed no significant difference. Buccal corridor ratio decreased in first premolar and second premolar extraction groups while non-extraction group showed no changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2024.051
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of mini-aesthetics in Class I malocclusion subjects who underwent orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of four premolars – A prospective study

Muhamed Shaloob, Prathapan Parayaruthottam, Vincy Antony, Muhammed Raheesh et al.
Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Assessment of mini-aesthetics in Class I malocclusion subjects who underwent orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of four premolars – A prospective study

Muhamed Shaloob, Prathapan Parayaruthottam, Vincy Antony, Muhammed Raheesh, Shahanamol VP, Archana Mohan Kumar
article en

Abstract

Smile and facial attractiveness are strongly correlatedThis study aimed to assess the effect of extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment on mini-aesthetics in patients with Class I malocclusion by measurement of the smile variables. A total of 56 subjects were selected and grouped as Group 1- treated non-extraction, Group 2A-treated with extraction of first premolars and groups 2B- treated with extraction of second premolar teeth. Each subject was photographed with a posed smile and NHP using DSLR camera. The images were then imported into a computer software and the following smile parameters were assessed: gingival display, smile index, maxillary incisor display on smile and buccal corridor ratio. The mean measured maxillary incisor display was 1.39±0.34, 2.31±0.50 and 0.90±0.19mm in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured gingival display on smiling was 0.07±0.07, 0.38±0.65 and 0.07±0.15mm in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured smile index was 0.15±0.68, 1.20±0.22 and 0.95±0.41 in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured buccal corridor ratio was 0.83±0.39, 1.59±0.26 and 1.26±0.31 in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. There was an increase in maxillary incisor display after fixed Orthodontic treatment in the non-extraction group and a decrease in first premolar extraction group while second premolar extraction group showed no changes. Smile index was increased post-treatment in first premolar and second premolar extraction group while non-extraction group showed no significant difference. Buccal corridor ratio decreased in first premolar and second premolar extraction groups while non-extraction group showed no changes.

Journal of Contemporary OrthodonticsVol. 8(3)
T. D. Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of mini-aesthetics in Class I malocclusion subjects who underwent orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of four premolars – A prospective study — Muhamed Shaloob, Prathapan Parayaruthottam, et al. · Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS