‘Pioneers of culture’: Australian natural history and the German colonial imaginary

Many contemporary efforts to attend to the coloniality of nineteenth-century natural collections rely on the reconceptualization of items held in these collections as cultural belongings. After describing the significance of this development, the article seeks to complicate the hope invested in 'culture' in this particular context. It argues that it resonates rather strangely, at least with the German historical record, where a particular understanding of natural history as performing the work of culture was articulated at precisely the time these collections were being made. With a particular focus on what nineteenth-century German-language publications wrote about Richard Schomburgk, a Prussian-trained naturalist and long-time director of the Adelaide Botanic Garden, it analyses how German-speaking actors moving within British colonial networks were framed as 'pioneers of culture'. The article argues that the figure of the 'pioneer of culture' embodied a German investment, real and imagined, in Anglophone settler colonialism; that it helped to describe natural history collecting as central rather than peripheral to this colonial imaginary; and that it denoted a wilful refusal to acknowledge the violent nature of both enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Continuum
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2024.2394957
Primary Topic
Australian Indigenous Culture and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Pioneers of culture’: Australian natural history and the German colonial imaginary

Anja Schwarz
Continuum
Australian Indigenous Culture and History
article

‘Pioneers of culture’: Australian natural history and the German colonial imaginary

Anja Schwarz
article en

Abstract

Many contemporary efforts to attend to the coloniality of nineteenth-century natural collections rely on the reconceptualization of items held in these collections as cultural belongings. After describing the significance of this development, the article seeks to complicate the hope invested in 'culture' in this particular context. It argues that it resonates rather strangely, at least with the German historical record, where a particular understanding of natural history as performing the work of culture was articulated at precisely the time these collections were being made. With a particular focus on what nineteenth-century German-language publications wrote about Richard Schomburgk, a Prussian-trained naturalist and long-time director of the Adelaide Botanic Garden, it analyses how German-speaking actors moving within British colonial networks were framed as 'pioneers of culture'. The article argues that the figure of the 'pioneer of culture' embodied a German investment, real and imagined, in Anglophone settler colonialism; that it helped to describe natural history collecting as central rather than peripheral to this colonial imaginary; and that it denoted a wilful refusal to acknowledge the violent nature of both enterprises.

ContinuumVol. 39(1)
University of Potsdam (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Australian Indigenous Culture and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.