Inter-laboratory comparison of eleven quantitative or digital PCR assays for detection of proviral bovine leukemia virus in blood samples

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is the etiological agent of enzootic bovine leukosis and causes a persistent infection that can leave cattle with no symptoms. Many countries have been able to successfully eradicate BLV through improved detection and management methods. However, with the increasing novel molecular detection methods there have been few efforts to standardize these results at global scale. This study aimed to determine the interlaboratory accuracy and agreement of 11 molecular tests in detecting BLV. Each qPCR/ddPCR method varied by target gene, primer design, DNA input and chemistries. DNA samples were extracted from blood of BLV-seropositive cattle and lyophilized to grant a better preservation during shipping to all participants around the globe. Twenty nine out of 44 samples were correctly identified by the 11 labs and all methods exhibited a diagnostic sensitivity between 74 and 100%. Agreement amongst different assays was linked to BLV copy numbers present in samples and the characteristics of each assay (i.e., BLV target sequence). Finally, the mean correlation value for all assays was within the range of strong correlation. This study highlights the importance of continuous need for standardization and harmonization amongst assays and the different participants. The results underscore the need of an international calibrator to estimate the efficiency (standard curve) of the different assays and improve quantitation accuracy. Additionally, this will inform future participants about the variability associated with emerging chemistries, methods, and technologies used to study BLV. Altogether, by improving tests performance worldwide it will positively aid in the eradication efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Veterinary Research
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04228-z
Citations
9
Primary Topic
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-laboratory comparison of eleven quantitative or digital PCR assays for detection of proviral bovine leukemia virus in blood samples

Pamela Anahí Lendez, Aneta Pluta, Guillermina Laura Dolcini, Chengming Wang et al.
9 citations
BMC Veterinary Research
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
2.16
article

Inter-laboratory comparison of eleven quantitative or digital PCR assays for detection of proviral bovine leukemia virus in blood samples

Pamela Anahí Lendez, Aneta Pluta, Guillermina Laura Dolcini, Chengming Wang, Casey J. Droscha, Juan Pablo Jaworski, Marı́a José Ruano, Antônio Augusto Fonseca Júnior, Rodrigo Puentes, Dragan Brnić, Stephen Valas, Andreja Jungić, Vanesa Ruiz, Marcelo Fernandes Camargos, Aleksandra Giza, Kenji Murakami, Tasia M. Taxis, Jacek Kuźmak, Subarna Barua, Sophie VanderWeele, MLaureana De Brun, Marla Eliana Ladera Gómez, Azucena Sánchez, Kurumi Nakamura
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is the etiological agent of enzootic bovine leukosis and causes a persistent infection that can leave cattle with no symptoms. Many countries have been able to successfully eradicate BLV through improved detection and management methods. However, with the increasing novel molecular detection methods there have been few efforts to standardize these results at global scale. This study aimed to determine the interlaboratory accuracy and agreement of 11 molecular tests in detecting BLV. Each qPCR/ddPCR method varied by target gene, primer design, DNA input and chemistries. DNA samples were extracted from blood of BLV-seropositive cattle and lyophilized to grant a better preservation during shipping to all participants around the globe. Twenty nine out of 44 samples were correctly identified by the 11 labs and all methods exhibited a diagnostic sensitivity between 74 and 100%. Agreement amongst different assays was linked to BLV copy numbers present in samples and the characteristics of each assay (i.e., BLV target sequence). Finally, the mean correlation value for all assays was within the range of strong correlation. This study highlights the importance of continuous need for standardization and harmonization amongst assays and the different participants. The results underscore the need of an international calibrator to estimate the efficiency (standard curve) of the different assays and improve quantitation accuracy. Additionally, this will inform future participants about the variability associated with emerging chemistries, methods, and technologies used to study BLV. Altogether, by improving tests performance worldwide it will positively aid in the eradication efforts.

BMC Veterinary ResearchVol. 20(1)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Iwate University (JP), Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tandil (AR), Croatian Veterinary Institute (HR), National Veterinary Research Institute (PL), Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (BR), Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR), Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (ES), NorthStar Cooperative (United States) (US), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR), Auburn University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Université de Liège, Państwowy Instytut Weterynaryjny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
2.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.