Concept design overview: a question of choices and compromise

The Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) programme hypothesizes that a compact machine offers a route to reduced capital cost that directly tackles the barrier to entry of this potentially transformative technology. History has shown that with an unsolved, complex and highly interdependent design challenge, there is a need to balance exploration of the problem with progress. Almost all complex systems arise from the evolutionary improvement of simpler systems which is an approach the programme has adopted by working through a virtual natural selection of design families towards a single concept consistent with the initiating hypothesis. Issues are uncovered and solved more rapidly this way because the effort is focused on an end. In this current phase, STEP has had to be an agile fast-moving programme to work with what emerges as well as what was planned, to sit with uncertainty and to embrace self-organizing principles. The complex decision-making and compromises in emerging trades have led to a concept respectful of the tight aspect ratio hypothesis which carefully balances cost, performance and deliverability. It remains a high-risk and high-reward programme, but the character of the challenge is better understood building confidence and enhancing capability to advance the evolving design further.This article is part of the theme issue 'Delivering Fusion Energy - The Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0414
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concept design overview: a question of choices and compromise

Jonathan Keep, Stuart I. Muldrew, Chris Waldon, Roel Verhoeven et al.
25 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Magnetic confinement fusion research
16.49
article

Concept design overview: a question of choices and compromise

Jonathan Keep, Stuart I. Muldrew, Chris Waldon, Roel Verhoeven, Mark Kisbey-Ascott, T. Thompson
article en
25 citations

Abstract

The Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) programme hypothesizes that a compact machine offers a route to reduced capital cost that directly tackles the barrier to entry of this potentially transformative technology. History has shown that with an unsolved, complex and highly interdependent design challenge, there is a need to balance exploration of the problem with progress. Almost all complex systems arise from the evolutionary improvement of simpler systems which is an approach the programme has adopted by working through a virtual natural selection of design families towards a single concept consistent with the initiating hypothesis. Issues are uncovered and solved more rapidly this way because the effort is focused on an end. In this current phase, STEP has had to be an agile fast-moving programme to work with what emerges as well as what was planned, to sit with uncertainty and to embrace self-organizing principles. The complex decision-making and compromises in emerging trades have led to a concept respectful of the tight aspect ratio hypothesis which carefully balances cost, performance and deliverability. It remains a high-risk and high-reward programme, but the character of the challenge is better understood building confidence and enhancing capability to advance the evolving design further.This article is part of the theme issue 'Delivering Fusion Energy - The Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 382(2280)
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
16.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.